AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Council report

[KnobenW at telekom.de]

Thanks Angie, I'll include this



Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich



________________________________
Von: angie12345 at gmail.com [mailto:angie12345 at gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Angie Graves
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2012 21:40
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Betreff: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Council report

Hi All,

For the Voting Thresholds for Delaying a PDP, I see no content in the presentation.

>From Marika, the current thresholds for terminating and initiating a PDP are as follows:

 *   Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a Final Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant cause, upon a motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor of termination.
 *   Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described in Annex A<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA>): requires an affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3) of one House.

A staff recommendation has been made but has not yet gained consensus in the group.

Best regards,

Angie


On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:47 PM, <KnobenW at telekom.de<mailto:KnobenW at telekom.de>> wrote:
All,

attached is the draft report to the council on Saturday morning. Please feel free to comment/amend.
I'd like to send it to Glen by tomorrow 19:00 UTC for posting.

Best regards
Wolf-


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20120620/a5eaeebc/attachment.html>