[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: Last Call: Raising an Issue

[KnobenW at telekom.de]

Thanks Julie.

All, please keep the deadline. No response is seen as supportive to option #1.


Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich

________________________________
Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. November 2012 20:52
An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Last Call: Raising an Issue

Dear SCI members,

On today's call it was agreed that there should be a "last call" for the review of the options on raising an issue.  Based on the discussion in Toronto and in today's meeting it appears that there is consensus around option number 1 - maintaining the status quo.  See the details below and on the wiki at: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg00390.html.

Please respond by **Friday, 09 November COB** as to whether you favor option 1 or another option.

Thank you for your assistance.

Best regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] For your review - raising an issue options

 *   To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at xxxxxxxxx>
 *   Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] For your review - raising an issue options
 *   From: Marika Konings <marika.konings at xxxxxxxxx>
 *   Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 03:32:13 -0700

________________________________
Dear All,  In relation to the agenda item 'Raising an issue - Has this been sufficiently  clarified', three possible approaches were identified during the last meeting:   1.  Maintain status quo - which means only the GNSO Council or a group  chartered by the GNSO Council can request an item to be reviewed by the SCI.  Possibly consider communicating to other SO/ACs / individuals, that if there  are issues they would like to see reviewed by the SCI, that they will need to  channel these via the GNSO Council and/or a group chartered by the GNSO Council.  2.  Add the possibility for other ICANN SO/ACs to make a direct request to the  SCI - this would require a change to the SCI Charter and would need GNSO  Council approval.  3.  Add the possibility for any chartered group to make a direct request to  the SCI - this would require a change to the SCI Charter and would need GNSO  Council approval. Some also noted that a definition of 'chartered' would be  needed as it is not clear whether SO/ACs are chartered.  Members are encouraged to share their views on these three options and/or  identify any other options that should be considered to address thisissue  ahead of the next meeting.  With best regards,  Marika
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20121102/875ebc94/attachment.html>