[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] On SCI consensus and impasse
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Thu Jan 24 03:10:04 UTC 2013
On 23 Jan 2013, at 20:12, Ron Andruff wrote:
> Holding the working group hostage until that individual deems to be satisfied, while others are not, is inequitable.
Are you alluding to an specific example.
I find your reference to members of the group holding other members hostage, somewhat problematic.
In terms of the charter, while I am comfortable with cleanup, I am not comfortable with a re-write.
avri
More information about the Gnso-improvem-impl-sc
mailing list