[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] On SCI consensus and impasse

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Thu Jan 24 03:10:04 UTC 2013



On 23 Jan 2013, at 20:12, Ron Andruff wrote:

> Holding the working group hostage until that individual deems to be satisfied, while others are not, is inequitable.  


Are you alluding to an specific example.

I find your reference to members of the group holding other members hostage, somewhat problematic.

In terms of the charter, while I am comfortable with cleanup, I am not comfortable with a re-write.   

avri





More information about the Gnso-improvem-impl-sc mailing list