[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Revised SCI - PDP Manual

Tue Jun 4 22:46:54 UTC 2013

Maybe I can shed some light as well. The SCI Charter foresees that 'For the
periodic review of recommendations, the SCI is expected to  develop a
consistent review plan indicating items to be reviewed,  proposed timeline
as well as additional resources needed, if any. This  review plan will be
submitted to the GNSO Council for its information'. This also includes the
PDP Manual and related Bylaw provisions.  In the PDP-WT Final Report, the WT
recommended that 'the periodic assessment of the overall PDP process is
important, noting that a certain threshold of completed PDPs should be met
before an overall review is carried out'. The revised PDP was adopted by the
ICANN Board in December 2011. It may be worth noting though that, to date,
no PDP has been completely run under the new rules.

Julie developed the attached list of adopted recommendations and status a
while back that should give you a better idea which other recommendations
currently fall under the SCI's remit for periodic review (note, that the
status of some of these needs to be updated).

Best regards,

Marika

From:  Ron Andruff <randruff at rnapartners.com>
Date:  Tuesday 4 June 2013 23:43
To:  "'Aikman-Scalese, Anne'" <AAikman at lrlaw.com>, Julie Hedlund
<julie.hedlund at icann.org>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org"
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
Subject:  RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Revised SCI - PDP Manual

I have to admit, Anne, that this is something that I, too, am unfamiliar
with.  Perhaps Julie can assist us with some institutional memory?

Kind regards,

RA

Ron Andruff
RNA Partners
www.rnapartners.com <http://www.rnapartners.com>

From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Aikman-Scalese,
Anne
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 17:38
To: 'Ron Andruff'; 'Julie Hedlund'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Revised SCI Charter 04 June
2013

Could someone please clarify for me what we are supposed to do in evaluating
the effectiveness of the changes in By-Laws and Operating Procedures in
relation to adoption of the PDP Manual?  This strikes me as a very large
task that someone thinks is "in-scope" and could affect how we treat this
Charter issue.  Anne

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP € Suite 700
One South Church Avenue € Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 € Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman at LRLaw.com € www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman
<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the
original message.

From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 2:33 PM
To: 'Julie Hedlund'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Revised SCI Charter 04 June
2013
Dear all,

I would welcome working through this document online to craft a revised
Charter that indeed reflects the current SCI mandate.

In that regard, I would also welcome a deeper discussion on the issue that
Mikey raised on the call, i.e., the substantive change from polishing
implementation issues from the last GNSO review versus continuing to do this
work on issues that arise within the Council or from Working Groups.

I understand from the BC and other constituencies, as well as from the GNSO
Chair, that there is an expectation that the SCI continue to serve but I
personally am agnostic.  Having said that, those of us who have been on the
SCI for some time will also recognize that we have been called on to deal
with more current issues than those that came from implementation.

Kind regards,

RA

Ron Andruff
RNA Partners
www.rnapartners.com <http://www.rnapartners.com>

From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 16:16
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Revised SCI Charter 04 June
2013
Importance: High

Dear SCI members,

Attached is the SCI Charter as revised during the SCI meeting on 04 June
2013.  The changes from today's meeting were grammatical corrections in the
General and Working Method sections.  The other changes that are redlined
and the comments are those proposed by the SCI Charter Drafting Team, and
the inclusion of the Chair and Vice Chair election process as previous
discussed and agreed to by the SCI.

Please send any comments to the list and this item will be on the agenda for
the next SCI meeting that will be scheduled in July based on the Doodle
poll.

Best regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to
www.lewisandroca.com <http://www.lewisandroca.com/> .

Phoenix (602)262-5311    Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090    Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200    Silicon Valley (650)391-1380
  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message
to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you
that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended
or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the
purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20130604/6ee58283/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3225 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20130604/6ee58283/image001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: List of documents relevant to the SCI - Updated 6 March 2012.doc
Type: application/applefile
Size: 450 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20130604/6ee58283/ListofdocumentsrelevanttotheSCI-Updated6March2012.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: List of documents relevant to the SCI - Updated 6 March 2012.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 34304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20130604/6ee58283/ListofdocumentsrelevanttotheSCI-Updated6March2012-0001.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5056 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20130604/6ee58283/smime.p7s>