[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Revised SCI - PDP Manual

Aikman-Scalese, Anne AAikman at lrlaw.com
Tue Jun 4 22:59:55 UTC 2013


Thanks Marika, very helpful.  I assume the group that worked on Charter revision did so with reference to these planned projects?  Anne

[cid:332165922 at 04062013-06D6]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700
One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman at LRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman at LRLaw.com> • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message.


________________________________
From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings at icann.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 3:47 PM
To: Ron Andruff; Aikman-Scalese, Anne; Julie Hedlund; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Revised SCI - PDP Manual

Maybe I can shed some light as well. The SCI Charter foresees that 'For the periodic review of recommendations, the SCI is expected to develop a consistent review plan indicating items to be reviewed, proposed timeline as well as additional resources needed, if any. This review plan will be submitted to the GNSO Council for its information'. This also includes the PDP Manual and related Bylaw provisions.  In the PDP-WT Final Report, the WT recommended that 'the periodic assessment of the overall PDP process is important, noting that a certain threshold of completed PDPs should be met before an overall review is carried out'. The revised PDP was adopted by the ICANN Board in December 2011. It may be worth noting though that, to date, no PDP has been completely run under the new rules.

Julie developed the attached list of adopted recommendations and status a while back that should give you a better idea which other recommendations currently fall under the SCI's remit for periodic review (note, that the status of some of these needs to be updated).

Best regards,

Marika

From: Ron Andruff <randruff at rnapartners.com<mailto:randruff at rnapartners.com>>
Date: Tuesday 4 June 2013 23:43
To: "'Aikman-Scalese, Anne'" <AAikman at lrlaw.com<mailto:AAikman at lrlaw.com>>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>>
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Revised SCI - PDP Manual

I have to admit, Anne, that this is something that I, too, am unfamiliar with.  Perhaps Julie can assist us with some institutional memory?
Kind regards,
RA
Ron Andruff
RNA Partners
www.rnapartners.com<http://www.rnapartners.com>
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 17:38
To: 'Ron Andruff'; 'Julie Hedlund'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Revised SCI Charter 04 June 2013
Could someone please clarify for me what we are supposed to do in evaluating the effectiveness of the changes in By-Laws and Operating Procedures in relation to adoption of the PDP Manual?  This strikes me as a very large task that someone thinks is "in-scope" and could affect how we treat this Charter issue.  Anne
<!--[if !vml]-->[cid:332165922 at 04062013-06DD]<!--[endif]-->Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700
One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman at LRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman at LRLaw.com> • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message.
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 2:33 PM
To: 'Julie Hedlund'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Revised SCI Charter 04 June 2013
Dear all,
I would welcome working through this document online to craft a revised Charter that indeed reflects the current SCI mandate.
In that regard, I would also welcome a deeper discussion on the issue that Mikey raised on the call, i.e., the substantive change from polishing implementation issues from the last GNSO review versus continuing to do this work on issues that arise within the Council or from Working Groups.
I understand from the BC and other constituencies, as well as from the GNSO Chair, that there is an expectation that the SCI continue to serve but I personally am agnostic.  Having said that, those of us who have been on the SCI for some time will also recognize that we have been called on to deal with more current issues than those that came from implementation.
Kind regards,
RA
Ron Andruff
RNA Partners
www.rnapartners.com<http://www.rnapartners.com>
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 16:16
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Revised SCI Charter 04 June 2013
Importance: High
Dear SCI members,
Attached is the SCI Charter as revised during the SCI meeting on 04 June 2013.  The changes from today's meeting were grammatical corrections in the General and Working Method sections.  The other changes that are redlined and the comments are those proposed by the SCI Charter Drafting Team, and the inclusion of the Chair and Vice Chair election process as previous discussed and agreed to by the SCI.
Please send any comments to the list and this item will be on the agenda for the next SCI meeting that will be scheduled in July based on the Doodle poll.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

________________________________

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.
Phoenix (602)262-5311



Reno (775)823-2900

Tucson (520)622-2090



Albuquerque (505)764-5400

Las Vegas (702)949-8200



Silicon Valley (650)391-1380


  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.



________________________________

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.

Phoenix (602)262-5311           Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090            Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200         Silicon Valley (650)391-1380

  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20130604/758f05e6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3225 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20130604/758f05e6/image001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3225 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20130604/758f05e6/image001-0001.gif>


More information about the Gnso-improvem-impl-sc mailing list