[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Charter revision what is our goal?

[Aikman-Scalese, Anne]

Unfortunately I have no views since J. Scott was spearheading for IPC and I was not involved.  So I am also at "Square 1" on this effort, but certainly recognize the need to at least update the Charter to do the work that everyone seems to be expecting at this point.  Anne


Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700
One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman at LRLaw.com • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 10:12 AM
To: 'Avri Doria'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Charter revision -- what is our goal?


Mikey,

I think Avri summed up my views, and those of most SCI members as well.
Julie's comments add a little more context to the matter.

Kind regards,

RA

Ron Andruff
RNA Partners
www.rnapartners.com

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2013 15:53
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Charter revision -- what is our goal?


Hi,

To add.  I approached it as a clean-up.  There were some anachronisms that need cleaning up based on the closing of OSC and PSC.

Some, those who wanted to change the way decisions were made, might have wanted to go beyond clean-up.

I am not sure that anyone was looking to give the SCI more function, but it is hard to be sure.  Certainly not one of my goals.

I think the SCI works best when it has precious little to do, and I do not agree with an SCI that goes looking for work.  Except for the periodic process reviews, which we have not done yet, I think all the rest of SCI work should be driven by the Council or Council chartered working groups.

But with questions like that, I am so glad you are on the SCI now

avri


On 6 Jun 2013, at 12:11, Mike O'Connor wrote:

> hi all,
>
> newbie question here.  i thought i'd frame it in a new thread just
> because
i'm getting a bit bewildered by all the topics in the list right now.
>
> here's my question:  what are we hoping to achieve with the change in
> the
Charter?
>
> possible answers -- we're trying to:
>
> -- clarify our original charge (in the following areas) in order to
accomplish the following goals
>
> -- expand on our original charge (in the following areas) in order to
accomplish the following goals
>
> -- do both of those things, to accomplish the following goals
>
> -- do something else, to accomplish the following goals
>
> i'm new, so i'd be delighted to just be pointed to this answer rather
> than
dragging it out of people on the list or the phone.
>
> thanks,
>
> mikey
>
>
>
> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE:
OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
>




----------------------
For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com.

Phoenix (602)262-5311                           Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090                            Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200                     Silicon Valley (650)391-1380

  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.
  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer