[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 03 June 2014
Terri Agnew
terri.agnew at icann.org
Wed Jun 4 13:06:55 UTC 2014
Dear All,
Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements
Implementation meeting held on Tuesday, 03 June 2014 at 19:00 UTC.
<http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-20140603-en.mp3>
http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-20140603-en.mp3
On page:
<http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#oct> http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#june
(transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page)
Attendees:
Ronald Andruff - Commercial and Business Users Constituency - Primary -
Chair
Greg Shatan - IPC - Alternate
Thomas Rickert - Nominating Committee Appointee - Alternate
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben - ISPs and connectivity providers Constituency (ISPCP) -
Primary Member
Avri Doria - Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG) - Primary Member
Cintra Sooknanan (Vice-Chair) - Not-for-Profit Organizations Constituency -
NPOC Constituency - Primary Member
Anne Aikman Scalese - IPC - Primary
Angie Graves - Business Constituency (BC) - Alternate
Lori Schulman - SOI
Apologies:
Amr Elsadr - Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC) - Primary Member
ICANN Staff:
Mary Wong
Julie Hedlund
Terri Agnew
** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Terri Agnew
Adobe Chat Transcript 03 June 2014
Terri Agnew:Welcome to the SCI call on the 3rd of June 2014
Ron A:Good day all!
Ron A:just waiting in the queue to come in on the call...
Thomas Rickert 3:Hi all!
Mary Wong:@Lori, do you have a Statement of Interest or an update to one?
lori schulman:Hi Mary, I don't believe so.
lori schulman:I am ramping up on everything.
Mary Wong:OK - I'll send you the link/form. We need it, and your SG/C
affiliation, per the GNSO WG Guidelines :)
lori schulman:No problem. I will do all that is required.
Mary Wong:Thanks so much!
Ron A:@ Anne: Is there a reason you would like to see this go to Legal
coincidentally with Pub Com?
Ron A:As opposed to serially?
Mary Wong:@Avri, that is what happens
Anne Aikman-Scalese:just want to know whether we are seeking Legal input
on all recommendations from scI as a matter of course
Greg Shatan:It sounds more like a "red flag" process than an "input"
process to me....
Mary Wong:On things like rules, procedures, published reports and policy
recommendations etc.., that's the practice (not just SCI or GNSO).
Mary Wong:@GReg, that's exactly right.
Anne Aikman-Scalese:okay, thanks. dont think Legal should delay
recommendations going to gnso
Mary Wong:No, absolutely.
Mary Wong:If necessary, we staff can be very pesky with our colleagues on
behalf of the community :)
Mary Wong:I thought Julie had abandoned us!!! :) :)
Anne Aikman-Scalese:no need to be pesky If Legal has comments, they should
send to GNSO directly and to us at the same time
Ron A:@ Anne: I think we agree with the principle you are bringing up,
however I see it as a quick 'sanity' check rather than a an ask for
approval.
Mary Wong:@Ron, as indeed it is!
Greg Shatan:How about this revision to the end of the new language:
"...shall be considered timely submitted for the next GNSO Council
meeting.."
Thomas Rickert 2:What about "as soon as practically possible"?
Anne Aikman-Scalese:It would be better to say directly whether or not such
a motion can be dealt with via e-mail voting.
Greg Shatan:I disagree. The question of whether this or any other motion
can be dealt with via e-mail voting.
Greg Shatan:is irrelevan to this rule.
Thomas Rickert 2:.shall be considered timely submitted for the next GNSO
Council meeting and dealt with according to the rules applying to GNSO
Council meeting
Anne Aikman-Scalese:It could still be deferred when considered.
Greg Shatan:@Avri -- how about my language above?
Anne Aikman-Scalese:Re "parking", I thought we said all of these items are
going out for public comment at the same time.
Anne Aikman-Scalese:Language in minutes lookjs good.
Cintra Sooknanan:I agree with Greg's analysis ....
Avri Doria:i am afraid it will be used to block.
Cintra Sooknanan:Avri would you prefer to change the shall to may?
Avri Doria:pabncake? what does that have to do with nything?
Greg Shatan:Exactly. It has nothing dto dowht anything....
Avri Doria:i accept Thomases langauge. I do not think it is redundnat.
and ass i say as written it will be used to block an intermediate vote
sooner or later. anyone who has done council knows that.
Anne Aikman-Scalese:Greg, are you saying amend to say "shall be
considered timely submitted for the next meeting"
Greg Shatan:Yes.
Avri Doria:i have been convinced that it is essential to change it.
Greg Shatan:Thumbs up for Option B.
Cintra Sooknanan:change it in what way? shall to may?
Avri Doria:Cintra, that iis not enough. and that might even block what
Greg wants.
Cintra Sooknanan:ok
Cintra Sooknanan:are you suggesting an option c?
Greg Shatan:I don't think we should preclude e-voting for these motions.
I just think it is not relevant here.
Anne Aikman-Scalese:If it is not precluded, that should be more clear as
in Option A draft language.
Cintra Sooknanan:I think it is relevant, but I think it has been catered
for
Cintra Sooknanan:evoting... can only take place with the disucssion taking
place on the mailing list etc
Cintra Sooknanan:may= can be at the next meeting or otherwise
lori schulman:I agree with Avri -- "may" appears to make the vote
optional.
Greg Shatan:I don't think Option B in any way precludes a request for
evoting or a special meeting.
Anne Aikman-Scalese:Greg is more of a purist than I am. He is legally
quite correct but I think it wont be clear to non-lawyers.
Greg Shatan:Meh.
Ron A:Thank you on behalf of the non-lawyers Anne! ;o)
Greg Shatan:@Avri -- it's treyfe! That's why it could not pass your lips.
Cintra Sooknanan:sorry have connection problems
Avri Doria:Greg: (:
Ron A:Cintra:Can you add your thoughts via the chat?
Anne Aikman-Scalese:Mary, is it always a motion?
Anne Aikman-Scalese:Thanks Avri.
Mary Wong:For COuncil voting? Yes I believe so - tho I will check re
Greg's question about the Chair.
Cintra Sooknanan:my issue is with the quorum
Cintra Sooknanan:was there any mention on quorum on an email vote
Cintra Sooknanan:is there automatic quorum?
Cintra Sooknanan:I am scanning the text but maybe I am missing it
Anne Aikman-Scalese:Check bylaws requirement for quorum per Cintra's
comment!
Mary Wong:There is a quorum requirement - think we tried to capture that
in Section 5
Cintra Sooknanan:is it that as long as the email credentials are sent out
the vote is assumed to be quorate
Cintra Sooknanan:?
Mary Wong:SEction 4.1 of the GNSO Op Proc, to be precise.
Cintra Sooknanan:sorry for not speaking earlier very noisy here at the
moment
Ron A:All good Cintra.
Cintra Sooknanan:my reason for declining approval was beacuse i think we
need to beef up the quorum section here
Cintra Sooknanan:thanks everyone... and to the subteam for their work on
this... :)
Anne Aikman-Scalese:Thanks everyone!
Cintra Sooknanan:bye everyone, thanks Ron
Thomas Rickert 2:bye all - cu in London! thanks Ron!
Greg Shatan:2:30 am for remote
lori schulman:thank you for my first meeting
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20140604/693af571/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5417 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20140604/693af571/smime.p7s>
More information about the Gnso-improvem-impl-sc
mailing list