[Gnso-newgtld-dg] Agenda for First Meeting of the Discussion Group for New gTLD Subsequent Rounds

[Michele Neylon - Blacknight]

Everyone should have an SOI

If they don't have one setting one up is not hard

..

I'd also respectfully suggest that any election / choice of DG leaders be deferred

I suspect that the group's make up will change between now and September as people come back from holidays etc and become aware of the group's existence

Regards

Michele


--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
http://www.blacknight.co/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://www.technology.ie
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

From: gnso-newgtld-dg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-newgtld-dg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 12:13 AM
To: gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-dg] Agenda for First Meeting of the Discussion Group for New gTLD Subsequent Rounds

be of an introductory nature. The proposed agenda is:

  *   Roll Call / Statements of Interest

Suggestion: only reading SoI for people that do not have GNSO SOIs (or have updates to), to shorten up this part.



  *   Applicability of ICANN principles of transparency and openness
  *   Items for initial review -  GNSO Resolution forming this group, GNSO Working Group Guidelines, GNSO Policy Development Process (to serve as a reference point for the DG)
  *   Discussion of Work Plan - Review of Interim Chair's Draft Work Plan and discussion of alternatives and tools for completing work
  *   Election of DG Leaders - The DG may elect to have co-chairs or vice-chairs. Once selected, the DG Chair(s) will need to be confirmed by the GNSO Council.

May I suggest that no attempt to see vice-chairs as representation of that constituency in the group ? It's so much simpler to have 2 (either chair/vice-chair, co-chair/co-chair, chair/alternate chair) leaders instead of a complex structure... since *-chairs only have coordination but no definition role, it's of no use to see too much into the roles.


Rubens



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-dg/attachments/20140806/b6964b96/attachment.html>