[Gnso-newgtld-dg] - Issues / Recommendations Matrix and Executive Summary
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Wed Mar 18 21:28:54 UTC 2015
Hi,
I think that the program only served one set of interests among the
Global Public Interests: It served the interests of businesses from the
global north. I believe it failed many other perspectives on the
Global Public Interests.
thanks
avri
On 18-Mar-15 15:52, Phil Buckingham wrote:
>
> Hi Avri,
>
>
>
> Like Bret, I don’t understand your comments re Round 1.
>
> I think what Round 1 has proved ( although I admit it is very very
> early days ), is that the global public interest has been served, but
> the “ global public” is simply not aware ( yet) that 1400+ new gTLD
> have and will open up the marketplace to the global public – the
> consumer , to give them better choice(s) , more competition (
> therefore lower prices ),better trust in the DNS. We now have IDNs in
> Arabic, Chinese, Hindu, Russian for the developing BRIC economies.
>
> However I agree the Joint Applicant Support programme was a complete
> failure by ICANN, with only ONE application going through evaluation.
> I am sure others have already identified this problem. A new JAS 2
> programme will need to be developed / incorporated within Round 2
> application processes and procedures and should, I feel, be added
> into the Matrix.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> Phil Buckingham
>
> CEO, Dot Advice Limited
>
> Corporate Advisor, MultiLingual Internet Group Inc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:*gnso-newgtld-dg-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:gnso-newgtld-dg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Avri Doria
> *Sent:* 18 March 2015 17:52
> *To:* gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-newgtld-dg] - Issues / Recommendations Matrix and
> Executive Summary
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree one aspect of the Global Public Interest (GPI0 in one way of
> understanding GPI was indeed served as you describe below.
> The issue is that the GPI is broader than that and is something that
> needs specific work and specific focus.
>
> Both in understanding it in respect to gTLDs and knowing how to take
> it into account in subsequent 'rounds'.
>
> I believe it is a top level issue that needs to dealt with in many
> respects.
>
> avri
>
> On 18-Mar-15 13:17, Bret Fausett wrote:
>
> Avri,
>
> I’m not sure I understand this completely, so I am hoping you can
> provide more details. My first reaction is that the global public
> interest was served by expanding the choices available when
> registering a domain name, bringing competition to the registry
> services space, and allowing people and companies to name
> themselves online with a label that provides greater semantic
> meaning. I also have statistics that show me that a meaningful
> number of registrations in Uniregistry TLDs come from countries
> identified as “developing countries” under either the UN or IMF
> definitions. To me, that’s a global public interest that was served.
>
>
>
> Now, I don’t propose to have that debate here, but is what I wrote
> above addressed to your issue, or were you raising something else?
> I think we already have identified issues around making sure that
> future registries come from developing economies.
>
>
>
> Bret
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 18, 2015, at 9:20 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
> <mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> I think one whole group of issues is missing from we need to
> have dealt with in the review.
>
> Did the gTLD server the pubic interest? It what ways could it
> have done this better? In terms of the future how do we
> design the policy to make sure that the global public
> interests, such as inclusion of developing economies and poor
> communities is supported? This is one area where many
> consider the gTLD to have bee na complete failure and to not
> have that represented as a section of our work seems a deficit.
>
>
> avri
>
> On 16-Mar-15 12:50, Steve Chan wrote:
>
> Dear DG Members,
>
>
>
> As discussed on today’s group call, staff is circulating
> the updated Issues / Recommendations matrix that was last
> edited by Jeff Neuman, along with his short explanation
> regarding the proposed groupings he included in the
> document (see below). I have also included his updated
> Executive Summary. As noted by Jeff on the call, the
> co-chairs request feedback by *30 Mar 2015* and preferably
> before, so as to be able to include for discussion during
> the DG call on 30 Mar 2015 at 14:00 UTC.
>
>
>
> Note, I have incorporated Philip Shepard’s proposed
> changes into tab 2 of the attached Excel sheet.
>
>
>
>
>
> "I refer to the Matrix that has Policies A-G, 1-20 and IG
> A through IG-R. With respect to the Potential New topics
> I refer to Excel row number in that 2^nd tab)
>
>
>
> _Group 1: Overall Process / Support / Outreach :_ A, C,
> 1, 9, 10 (concept), 12 (Concept), 13, IG A, IG B, IG C, IG
> D, IG E, IG I, IG M, IG N, IG O, IG Q, New Row 3)
>
>
>
> _Group 2: Legal / Regulatory_: 5, 10 (substance), 14, 15,
> 16, 17, 19, IG J, IG K, IG L, New Row 2, New Row 4, New
> Row 5, New Row 6
>
>
>
> _Group 3: Contentions / Objections & Disputes:_ G, 2, 3,
> 6, 12, 20, IG F, IG H, IG P, IG R
>
>
>
> _Group 4: Internationalized Domain Names_: B, 18
>
>
>
> _Group 5: Technical and Operations_: D, E, F, 4, 7, 8,
> New Row 7 (Name Collision)"
>
>
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Steven Chan*
> Sr. Policy Manager
>
> *ICANN
> *12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
>
> Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
> steve.chan at icann.org
> <mailto:steve.chan at icann.org>
> direct: +1.310.301.3886
> mobile: +1.310.339.4410
>
> tel: +1.310.301.5800
>
> fax: +1.310.823.8649
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Gnso-newgtld-dg mailing list
>
> Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org>
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-dg
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> <http://www.avast.com/>
>
>
>
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
> software.
> www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-dg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-dg
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Bret Fausett, Esq.*
>
> General Counsel, Uniregistry, Corp.
>
>
> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 200
>
> Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
>
> mobile +1 310 985 1351
>
> office +1 949 706 2300 x4201
>
> UTC -8 hours • http://uniregistry.link
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Gnso-newgtld-dg mailing list
>
> Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org>
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-dg
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> <http://www.avast.com/>
>
>
>
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/>
>
>
>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-dg/attachments/20150318/620aa380/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gnso-newgtld-dg
mailing list