[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt2] Recording, Attendance & AC Chat for New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Team - Track 2 - Legal Regulatory Issues
Michelle DeSmyter
michelle.desmyter at icann.org
Thu Oct 20 21:35:02 UTC 2016
Dear All,
Please find the attendance and recording of the call attached to this email and the AC Chat below for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Team – Track 2 – Legal/Regulatory Issues held on Thursday, 20 October 2016 at 20:00 UTC.
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__audio.icann.org_gnso_gnso-2Dnew-2Dgtld-2Dsubsequent-2D16may16-2Den.mp3&d=DQMF-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8_WhWIPqsLT6TmF1Zmyci866vcPSFO4VShFqESGe_5iHWGlBLwwwehFBfjrsjWv9&m=Zx5BSTxHyuQ1k0kWFuUD3QLERQ-qmyNLKD4EitZvXhg&s=5YGOaZMVSGtLFO1rpoTUBRqbLbY_W6brFs17LcTg700&e=>
The recordings of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group-2Dactivities_calendar-23nov&d=DQMF-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8_WhWIPqsLT6TmF1Zmyci866vcPSFO4VShFqESGe_5iHWGlBLwwwehFBfjrsjWv9&m=Zx5BSTxHyuQ1k0kWFuUD3QLERQ-qmyNLKD4EitZvXhg&s=fiTp8y1l5mm5sFzpecZ7zxKgmETN4SeZxhzYTsQIgis&e=>
** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt2
Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/2SC4Aw
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Michelle
-------------------------------
Adobe Connect chat transcript for 20 October 2016
Michelle DeSmyter:Dear all, Welcome to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Team – Track 2 – Legal/Regulatory Issues call on Thursday, 20 October 2016 at 20:00 UTC.
Phil Buckingham:Hi Michelle , Steve , Im in !
Phil Buckingham:thanks . Should be an "interesting " next hour !
Jeff Neuman:Hello all
Jeff Neuman:vtLD (Validated top Level domains)
Gg Levine (NABP):NABP is participating
Gg Levine (NABP):Absolutely!
Jeff Neuman:.bank yes
Jeff Neuman:.pharmacy, .ngo / .ong
Jeff Neuman:.law
Gg Levine (NABP):TLD in which regigrants must meet registry standards prior to use of the domain
Alexander Schubert:.gay :-)
Jim Prendergast:Jeff has them allmemorized
Paul McGrady:On a flight now, so only able to contribute via chat today.
Alexander Schubert:Not yet delegated
Jim Prendergast:still in contention, isnt it?
Alexander Schubert:Still in contention
Steve Chan:CTAG
Alexander Schubert:CTAG!
Steve Chan:Community TLD Applicant Group
Paul McGrady:@Jeff Neuman - I have missed a call or two due to a family issue. DId we decide to include the Terms & Conditions from the Guidebook into this group or will they be looked at in another group? Thanks!
Jeff Neuman:We consider feedback from everyone
Jeff Neuman:@Paul - Yes.....but have not looked at them yet
Paul McGrady:Perfect! Thanks @Jeff.
Phil Buckingham:kurt - can you speak up a little
Kurt Pritz:pretty close
Kurt Pritz:I am in a crowded spot. sorry
Kevin Kreuser:justification is the right term, IMO, but I think it should be a high bar
Jeff Neuman:@kevin - Why a high bar?
Alexander Schubert:Do we talk Spec 5?
Phil Buckingham:alexander - spec 5 later
Alexander Schubert:So is this top level or second level?
Jeff Neuman:@Alexander - both
Alexander Schubert:Seemingly 2nd....
Alexander Schubert:BOTH?
Alexander Schubert:Apples & Oranges?
Jeff Neuman:We will need to consider both reserved names at the top level as well as those at the second level
Kevin Kreuser:bc the justification for most changes requested to the RA in this round were not due to something special in the applicant or the category that the applicant lived, but instead were based on the business' own limitations. TM rights and for protections I think are an exception. Multiple agreements for registrars can also be difficult to implement
Jeff Neuman:How are multiple registry agreements difficult for registrars? (I am not disagreeing, but want to flush this out)
Jeff Neuman:@Kevin - If one registry agreement has a different indemnity provision than another....how would that affect registrars
Jeff Neuman:(as an example)
Kevin Kreuser:depends on what changes are permitted by category. if technical, which I hope would not be the case, could cause difficulties
Kevin Kreuser:nevermind us, we're just chatting
Jeff Neuman:Not sure why that is.....I will call in.
Kurt Pritz:one part of the COI question might be whether the COI is stiil
Kurt Pritz:required
Kevin Kreuser:@Kurt, ICANN would welcome eliminating the COI itself, but is still going to want a way to fund EBERO
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Finally into the AC Been on the audio bridge only until now
Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):Someone should take a look at the transcript of the new gTLD session in Toronto. Many participants raised complaints and concerns about the COI. ICANN's responses seem unlikely to be different now, IMHO.
Kurt Pritz:@Kevin. there are a lot of ways to skin that cat. For later substantive discussion
Kevin Kreuser:absolutely
Alexander Schubert:With reserved names we have to strictly distinguish between top and second level!
Alexander Schubert:CWG
Jeff Neuman:that was in 2006
Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):Are you talking about the 2006 WG?
Kevin Kreuser:@Kristina, ICANN is holding and managing LOIs and Data Escrow agreements for all of these TLDs. It's an administrative nightmare. I cannot imagine they wouldn't love to be rid of them, perhaps by way of insurance of some manner, taking a portion of the applicant fee and dumping into a pool, etc as an alternatives
Steve Chan:FYI, the document is un-synced...as Michael just noted.
Paul McGrady:Kevin, we went down the "insurance" path in Round 1 and it was rejected. Start ups are not the same risk footprint as .Brands.
Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):@Kevin: I think Paul McGrady has some views on ICANN as an insurer (although I was super sick in Dakar and could be misremembering).
Kevin Kreuser:Understand re insurance, point was more I believe they would be open to exploring better alternatives
Jeff Neuman:https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues_new-2Dgtlds_final-2Dreport-2Drn-2Dwg-2D23may07.htm&d=DQIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8_WhWIPqsLT6TmF1Zmyci866vcPSFO4VShFqESGe_5iHWGlBLwwwehFBfjrsjWv9&m=lDrkjUSWxiH6YXRdYjYR6YTk35JT1AwGgRzdinv_7gU&s=zTew0mJ0smzHg_hkXualbyHbXDHJr1sSScf4k50bE-k&e=
Michael Flemming:Staff, could we make a note in the Notes to capture the discussion on COIs that is taking place in the chat so that we may use this as feedback and come back to this when we are ready to have more detailed discussion?
Michael Flemming:please*
Michael Flemming:A lot of constructive discussion. Thank you, everyone.
Michael Flemming:Thanks!
Jeff Neuman:We should also split the top level from second level
Alexander Schubert:+1
Annebeth Lange:+ 1
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):+1
Julie Hedlund:@Michael: I have copied it, but I'll note that it is redundant. The chat notes are captured separately by the Secretariat staff and is posted to the wiki.
Alexander Schubert:And it Is split in the AG!
Paul McGrady:@Kevin, lots can be done with the EBERO issue to drive out costs and uncertainty, thus reducing ICANN's involvement/risk.
Alexander Schubert:Spec 5 is 2nd level, right?
Michael Flemming:Yes
Michael Flemming:Anything in the RA would refer to second level reservations
Michael Flemming:...I believe
Kevin Kreuser:some restrictions are at "all levels"
Kevin Kreuser:country and territory, for exampel
Jeff Neuman:I think we should take one by one
Jeff Neuman:See what the policy recomendation was and then compare with what was done
Steve Chan:Phil is discussing the existing Reserved Name Requirements (at that time)
Annebeth Lange:And the Reserved Names report came in 2006 - not completely consistent with the AG
Steve Chan:What is in the AC room is the recommendation table recommended for new gTLDs
Michael Flemming:Yes, Phil is looking at the Roles of Reserved Names Table
Jeff Neuman:The applicant Guidebook in Section 2.2.1.2.1 has the initial list of top-level reserved names
Jeff Neuman:Then this section was added: 2.2.1.2.3 to cover red cross / olympics
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Indeed Annebeth that out of Synch is important to note
Julie Hedlund:See the table at: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues_new-2Dgtlds_final-2Dreport-2Drn-2Dwg-2D23may07.htm&d=DQIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8_WhWIPqsLT6TmF1Zmyci866vcPSFO4VShFqESGe_5iHWGlBLwwwehFBfjrsjWv9&m=lDrkjUSWxiH6YXRdYjYR6YTk35JT1AwGgRzdinv_7gU&s=zTew0mJ0smzHg_hkXualbyHbXDHJr1sSScf4k50bE-k&e=
Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):May I suggest that we start with what was in the AG and only revert back to the Reserved Names WG recommendations and the 2000/2003 Reserved Name requirements, as needed?
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):works for me Kristina
Annebeth Lange:I agree
Annebeth Lange:It has been a lot of discussion between the result of the Reserved Names WG recommendations and the result in the AG
Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):+1 Jeff
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):+1
Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):Is there anyone who thinks that we shouldn't have reserved names on the top level?
Annebeth Lange:The AG should be the starting point here
Kevin Kreuser:home
Alexander Schubert:hiome?
Alexander Schubert:Yap: home
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):4
Julie Hedlund:All: Just a time check. 2 minutes to the top of the hour.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):WT4
Heather Forrest:It seems to me that it would be helpful to have everyone in the group go back to the RNWG Report to understand the justifications reached by that group
Jeff Neuman:@heather - yes please
Annebeth Lange:And we have to remember that this was long time ago - before the AG that I think had input from more stakeholdergroups than RNWG
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Have to leave my next call is starting now
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Bye
Paul McGrady:Thanks all!
Annebeth Lange:Bye
Alexander Schubert:Thanks!
Jeff Neuman:@Annabeth - Agree, BUT we need to revise the policy so we need to understand the original policy
Annebeth Lange:Absolutely, Jeff
Heather Forrest:thanks everyone
Robin Gross:thanks all, bye
Alexander Schubert:Midnight :-)
Robert Burlingame:Thank you. Bye.
Annebeth Lange:Here too, ALexander
Emily Barabas:Next call will be after ICANN57, invitation to be sent out
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt2/attachments/20161020/ba8f18e2/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Track2 20 October 2016[1].mp3
Type: audio/mpeg
Size: 7022132 bytes
Desc: Track2 20 October 2016[1].mp3
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt2/attachments/20161020/ba8f18e2/Track220October20161-0001.mp3>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Attendance New gTLD Sub Pro Track 2 Sheet1.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 28541 bytes
Desc: Attendance New gTLD Sub Pro Track 2 Sheet1.pdf
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt2/attachments/20161020/ba8f18e2/AttendanceNewgTLDSubProTrack2Sheet1-0001.pdf>
More information about the Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt2
mailing list