[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt2] Registrant Protections Discussion

[Michael Flemming]

And I just realized I forgot the attachment. I will follow up with that.

It is also in the agenda sent last week and the wiki page for the 19
January meeting.

Regards,

Michael Flemming

2017年1月24日火曜日、Michael Flemming<flemming at brightsconsulting.com>さんは書きました:

> At our last meeting on January 19th at 20 UTC we introduced the Registrant
> Protections (EBERO, COI, and When Registrants don't apply topics). While
> these topics are vast and much can be discussed, we are unable to spend all
> of our time discussing during our bi-weekly hour meetings. Therefore, I
> would like to continue this discussion over email.
>
> I attach here the same presentation material we used in the meeting in
> order to provide everyone with the necessary background information.
> However, I have pulled out the questions from the presentation and listed
> them below. These same questions will be copied to the Issues Area
> Working Document
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YsbOmz06YbXBkUQpj1rljVo-bTH-Br5Ju6cVJvpb2dM/edit?usp=sharing>.
> Perhaps it is easier, however, to have a discussion on a consistent email
> thread. Key feedback will also be moved to the document.
>
> I invite everyone to provide their opinion to the questions below.
>
> *Critical Registry Functions:*
>
>
> *Are the current Critical Registry Functions still sufficient or do
> changes need to be made? *
>
>
> *Has any registry gone above the Emergency Threshold before?*
>
>
> *Has the level of the Emergency Threshold ever been reached that would
> initiate an emergency escalation or EBERO?*
>
>
>
> *COI:*
>
>
> *Are the cost measurements for the COI still sufficient to cover the
> critical functions for EBERO?*
>
>
> *Is the time period for the COI sufficient (i.e. 6 years from the
> execution date of the RA)?*
>
>
> *Are the requirements for the Letter of Credit still sufficient?*
>
>
> *Can other models besides the Letter of Credit and the Cash Escrow Deposit
> be considered for the COI requirements?*
>
>
>
> *In regards to TLDs like Brand TLDs and Code of Conduct exempt TLDs where
> Registrants may not be necessary to protect:*
>
>
> *Should more relevant rules be established for certain specific cases or
> categories of TLDs?*
>
>
>
> Below are additional questions I would like to add on material we were not
> able to cover in the last meeting. These are kind of last minute additions
> and the questions could probably be refined.
>
> *In regards to Background Checks on applicants:*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Are the background checks a sufficient mechanism for protecting
> Registrants?Do the requirements for Background Checks in regards to (1)
> General business diligence and criminal history and (2) History of
> cybersquatting behavior prove sufficient and/or necessary for TLDs where
> Registrant Protections may not be necessary?*
>
> I have a few other additional questions I would like to ask, but need more
> time to formulate them.
>
> Please let me know your thoughts.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Michael Flemming
>
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt2/attachments/20170124/3ded1964/attachment.html>