[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4] Registry Services straw-person

Thu Dec 21 02:52:47 UTC 2017

Anne,

Firstly, if I may be so bold as to speak on behalf of both Jeff and me, we
understand that at this time of year and with travel commitments of many of
us, delays in response, (especially for volunteers)  can be delayed from
time to time.

Secondly, let me assure you that the Leadership is not ignoring previous
messages at all.

Thirdly, for now, please rest assured that like all the voices and opinions
of our WT and PDP Members, your points of view are being heard and will,
along with all other inputs, be considered by the WT as it works towards
beginning the drafting of its preliminary recommendations at the start of
the 2018 calendar year, for our March Timeline milestone.

Finally, when Jeff and I have our next Co-Chair call for 2017, I can assure
you that your correspondence on this matter will be on our Agenda to
discuss.

*Cheryl Langdon-O**rr ...  *(CLO)

about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr
[image: Cheryl Langdon-Orr on about.me]
  <http://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr>

On 21 December 2017 at 10:02, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrc.com> wrote:

> Rubens,
>
>
>
> Please excuse the delay in my reply as I have been traveling.
>
>
>
> I do not understand why you would require that I duplicate effort at a
> later stage of the subgroup’s deliberations.   The call was characterized
> as a “rough consensus” call and the slides state “Consensus Re”
> throughout.  There were no objections on the call to the language I
> suggested and Kurt supported one change very vocally.   Cheryl specifically
> asked for suggested language changes during the call and these were
> provided in chat.
>
>
>
> In order for the work of the Subgroup to be “up to date” and to clearly
> present the issues discussed, I must request once again that *the slides
> be revised in accordance with the call transcript* and that the most
> current work product of the group be posted to the wiki.
>
>
>
> Hopefully this third written request will not be ignored by Leadership.
>
>
>
> Anne
>
>
>
> *Anne E. Aikman-Scalese*
>
> Of Counsel
>
> 520.629.4428 office
>
> 520.879.4725 fax
>
> AAikman at lrrc.com
>
> _____________________________
>
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
>
> One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
>
> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>
> lrrc.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Rubens Kuhl [mailto:rubensk at nic.br]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 13, 2017 2:22 PM
> *To:* Aikman-Scalese, Anne
> *Cc:* Cheryl Langdon-Orr; gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4 at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4] Registry Services straw-person
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
>
>
> Anne,
>
>
>
> Since your request was directed to WG co-chairs I can't answer on it
> specifically, but regardless of what happens regarding the meeting #21
> slides, I suggest that you table the changes you meant for specific topics
> for meetings that happen in the future so these positions have
> consideration at some point, and they are either incorporated into proposed
> languages or considered but not incorporated. When we have meetings for
> those topics I doubt people will look at the slide archive, but they will
> definitely join the call, listen to recording or read transcripts.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Rubens
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Em 13 de dez de 2017, à(s) 16:25:000, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <
> AAikman at lrrc.com> escreveu:
>
>
>
> Cheryl and Jeff,
>
>
>
> Rubens says there will be no changes to the slides even though I was asked
> during the call to suggest language and even though the understanding was
> changes would be made to the slides since the items were noted as
> “consensus re”.
>
>
>
> I must strongly object to Rubens’ refusal to revise the slides in
> accordance with the transcript from the call, including Kurt Pritz’ very
> vocal support for one of the changes and no objections from others to the
> other requested changes.
>
>
>
> As written, the slides are not reflective of the last call.   If Rubens
> refuses to revise the slides, then please ask staff to do so based on the
> language that was typed into chat and agreed in the recording.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Anne
>
>
>
> *Anne E. Aikman-Scalese*
>
> Of Counsel
>
> 520.629.4428 office
>
> 520.879.4725 fax
>
> AAikman at lrrc.com
>
> _____________________________
>
> <image003.png>
>
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
>
> One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
>
> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>
> lrrc.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Rubens Kuhl [mailto:rubensk at nic.br <rubensk at nic.br>]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 12, 2017 5:33 PM
> *To:* Aikman-Scalese, Anne
> *Cc:* Cheryl Langdon-Orr; gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4 at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4] Registry Services straw-person
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 12 Dec 2017, at 20:31, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Cheryl and Rubens,
>
> There were consistent references to “rough consensus” in the discussion
> during this meeting.
>
>
>
>
>
> As was mentioned right when the meeting started, it wasn't a meeting to
> decide anything, so no any mention was a reference to previous meetings
> when decisions were made.
>
>
>
>
>   In addition, there were several changes to the slides which were
> recommended and agreed.  These changes do not appear in the slides at this
> time.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> When may we expect them?
>
>
>
> We won't rewrite history and pretend something different than actually
> presented had happened. It was a recap, so anything that might require
> change has to be decided during meetings that actually decide any of the
> topics where you can suggest changes to actual decisions.
>
>
>
>
>
> Rubens
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4/attachments/20171221/83941871/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6500 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4/attachments/20171221/83941871/image003-0001.png>