[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Notes & Action Items - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Work Track 5 - 17 April 2019

[Julie Hedlund]

Dear Work Track 5 members,



Please see below the action items and notes from the Work Track 5 meeting today, 17 April 2019.  These high-level notes are designed to help WT5 members navigate through the content of the call and are not a substitute for the recording, transcript, or the chat, which will be posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2019-04-17+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Procedures+PDP+Work+Track+5.



Kind regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director



Notes and Action Items:

1. Action Items:

ACTION ITEM: Question e9: Request clarification from Honduras (RDS-HN).

2. Brief Notes:

Question e8:
Line 145 -- Governments of Argentina, Chile, Colombia -- official, relevant national, regional, and community languages
Line 146 -- IPC -- Concerns -- official languages
Line 147 -- INTA -- official languages
Line 148 -- United States -- UN and official languages
Line 149 -- Group of Registries -- Divergence -- official languages, does not support requirement of support/non-objection
Line 150 -- Brand Registry Group -- Divergence -- no translations
Line 151 -- Registrar Stakeholder Group -- Divergence -- no translations
Line 152 -- NCSG -- Divergence -- no translations (or reservations of geo names period)
Line 153 -- RySG -- [does not appear to directly answer the question]

Question e9:
Line 155 -- Business Constituency -- Kept
Line 156 -- IPC -- Kept, or perhaps modified (to not be required if applicant is using as a .brand)
Line 157 -- ALAC -- Some want to keep, some want to modify
Line 158 -- Government of Spain, etc. -- Modified (as in, the letter should always be required)
Line 159 -- Portuguese Government -- Modified (as in, the letter should always be required)
Line 160 -- Governments of Argentina, Chile, and Colombia -- Modified (as in, the letter should always be required)
Line 161 -- Government of Brazil --Modified (as in, the letter should always be required)
Line 162 -- United States -- New Idea -- modified (to a different standard…)
Line 163 -- dotBerlin etc. -- New Idea -- modified (to reference specific list)
Line 164 -- Dotzon -- New Idea -- modified (to reference specific list)
Line 165 -- Brand Registry Group -- New Idea -- modified (optional)
Line 166 -- INTA -- modified (to not be required if applicant has TM rights)
Line 167 -- RySG -- Agreement (qualified) -- some want to eliminate, some want to modify
Line 168 -- NCSG -- New Idea, Concerns -- modified (as in, insert contractual requirements), curative mechanism
Line 169 -- Registrar Stakeholder Group -- Divergence -- eliminated (as in, support or non-objection should never be needed)
Line 170 -- Group of Registries -- Divergence -- eliminated (as in, support or non-objection should never be needed)
Line 171 -- RDS-HN -- [comment]

Question e10:
Line 173 -- Government of Spain, etc. -- modified (as in, the letter should always be required), does not reference specific proposals
Line 174 -- Portuguese Government -- modified (as in, the letter should always be required), does not reference specific proposals
Line 175 -- Governments of Argentina, Chile, and Colombia -- modified (as in, the letter should always be required), does not reference specific proposals
Line 176 -- dotBerlin -- proposal 21
Line 177 -- dotzon -- proposals 19 (variant 3), 21, 23, 26, 24, and 25 (but qualified)
Line 178 -- Registrar Stakeholder Group -- proposal 20
Line 179 -- IPC -- Supports proposals 19, 20, 26; opposes proposal 19 v1, v2, and v3; 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
Line 180 -- United States -- modified (to a different standard…); curative mechanism/PIC; does not reference specific proposals
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20190417/4c07357b/attachment.html>