[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Notes & Action Items - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Work Track 5 - 17 April 2019

[Justine Chew]

Hi Julie,

If we're getting clarification from RDS-HN on their response to Question e9
then we might as well also ask for clarification on their responses to the
other questions as highlighted from last week's call.

Much obliged,

Justine Chew
-----


On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 05:27, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org> wrote:

> Dear Work Track 5 members,
>
>
>
> Please see below the action items and notes from the Work Track 5 meeting
> today, 17 April 2019.  *These high-level notes are designed to help WT5
> members navigate through the content of the call and are not a substitute
> for the recording, transcript, or the chat, which will be posted on the
> wiki at:
> https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2019-04-17+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Procedures+PDP+Work+Track+5
> <https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2019-04-17+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Procedures+PDP+Work+Track+5>.
> *
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Julie
>
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
>
>
> *Notes and Action Items:*
>
>
>
> *1. Action Items:*
>
>
>
> ACTION ITEM: Question e9: Request clarification from Honduras (RDS-HN).
>
>
>
> *2. Brief Notes:*
>
>
>
> *Question e8*:
>
> Line 145 -- Governments of Argentina, Chile, Colombia -- official,
> relevant national, regional, and community languages
>
> Line 146 -- IPC -- Concerns -- official languages
>
> Line 147 -- INTA -- official languages
>
> Line 148 -- United States -- UN and official languages
>
> Line 149 -- Group of Registries -- Divergence -- official languages, does
> not support requirement of support/non-objection
>
> Line 150 -- Brand Registry Group -- Divergence -- no translations
>
> Line 151 -- Registrar Stakeholder Group -- Divergence -- no translations
>
> Line 152 -- NCSG -- Divergence -- no translations (or reservations of geo
> names period)
>
> Line 153 -- RySG -- [does not appear to directly answer the question]
>
>
>
> *Question e9*:
>
> Line 155 -- Business Constituency -- Kept
>
> Line 156 -- IPC -- Kept, or perhaps modified (to not be required if
> applicant is using as a .brand)
>
> Line 157 -- ALAC -- Some want to keep, some want to modify
>
> Line 158 -- Government of Spain, etc. -- Modified (as in, the letter
> should always be required)
>
> Line 159 -- Portuguese Government -- Modified (as in, the letter should
> always be required)
>
> Line 160 -- Governments of Argentina, Chile, and Colombia -- Modified (as
> in, the letter should always be required)
>
> Line 161 -- Government of Brazil --Modified (as in, the letter should
> always be required)
>
> Line 162 -- United States -- New Idea -- modified (to a different
> standard…)
>
> Line 163 -- dotBerlin etc. -- New Idea -- modified (to reference specific
> list)
>
> Line 164 -- Dotzon -- New Idea -- modified (to reference specific list)
>
> Line 165 -- Brand Registry Group -- New Idea -- modified (optional)
>
> Line 166 -- INTA -- modified (to not be required if applicant has TM
> rights)
>
> Line 167 -- RySG -- Agreement (qualified) -- some want to eliminate, some
> want to modify
>
> Line 168 -- NCSG -- New Idea, Concerns -- modified (as in, insert
> contractual requirements), curative mechanism
>
> Line 169 -- Registrar Stakeholder Group -- Divergence -- eliminated (as
> in, support or non-objection should never be needed)
>
> Line 170 -- Group of Registries -- Divergence -- eliminated (as in,
> support or non-objection should never be needed)
>
> Line 171 -- RDS-HN -- [comment]
>
>
>
> *Question e10:*
>
> Line 173 -- Government of Spain, etc. -- modified (as in, the letter
> should always be required), does not reference specific proposals
>
> Line 174 -- Portuguese Government -- modified (as in, the letter should
> always be required), does not reference specific proposals
>
> Line 175 -- Governments of Argentina, Chile, and Colombia -- modified (as
> in, the letter should always be required), does not reference specific
> proposals
>
> Line 176 -- dotBerlin -- proposal 21
>
> Line 177 -- dotzon -- proposals 19 (variant 3), 21, 23, 26, 24, and 25
> (but qualified)
>
> Line 178 -- Registrar Stakeholder Group -- proposal 20
>
> Line 179 -- IPC -- Supports proposals 19, 20, 26; opposes proposal 19 v1,
> v2, and v3; 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
>
> Line 180 -- United States -- modified (to a different standard…); curative
> mechanism/PIC; does not reference specific proposals
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20190418/bbb811e7/attachment-0001.html>