[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] [Ext] Re: Notes & Action Items - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Work Track 5 - 17 April 2019

[Julie Hedlund]

Thanks Justine and noted.

Best,
Julie

From: Justine Chew <justine.chew at gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 at 5:50 PM
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Cc: "gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Notes & Action Items - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Work Track 5 - 17 April 2019

Hi Julie,

If we're getting clarification from RDS-HN on their response to Question e9 then we might as well also ask for clarification on their responses to the other questions as highlighted from last week's call.

Much obliged,

Justine Chew
-----


On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 05:27, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>> wrote:

Dear Work Track 5 members,



Please see below the action items and notes from the Work Track 5 meeting today, 17 April 2019.  These high-level notes are designed to help WT5 members navigate through the content of the call and are not a substitute for the recording, transcript, or the chat, which will be posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2019-04-17+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Procedures+PDP+Work+Track+5.



Kind regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director



Notes and Action Items:

1. Action Items:

ACTION ITEM: Question e9: Request clarification from Honduras (RDS-HN).

2. Brief Notes:

Question e8:
Line 145 -- Governments of Argentina, Chile, Colombia -- official, relevant national, regional, and community languages
Line 146 -- IPC -- Concerns -- official languages
Line 147 -- INTA -- official languages
Line 148 -- United States -- UN and official languages
Line 149 -- Group of Registries -- Divergence -- official languages, does not support requirement of support/non-objection
Line 150 -- Brand Registry Group -- Divergence -- no translations
Line 151 -- Registrar Stakeholder Group -- Divergence -- no translations
Line 152 -- NCSG -- Divergence -- no translations (or reservations of geo names period)
Line 153 -- RySG -- [does not appear to directly answer the question]

Question e9:
Line 155 -- Business Constituency -- Kept
Line 156 -- IPC -- Kept, or perhaps modified (to not be required if applicant is using as a .brand)
Line 157 -- ALAC -- Some want to keep, some want to modify
Line 158 -- Government of Spain, etc. -- Modified (as in, the letter should always be required)
Line 159 -- Portuguese Government -- Modified (as in, the letter should always be required)
Line 160 -- Governments of Argentina, Chile, and Colombia -- Modified (as in, the letter should always be required)
Line 161 -- Government of Brazil --Modified (as in, the letter should always be required)
Line 162 -- United States -- New Idea -- modified (to a different standard…)
Line 163 -- dotBerlin etc. -- New Idea -- modified (to reference specific list)
Line 164 -- Dotzon -- New Idea -- modified (to reference specific list)
Line 165 -- Brand Registry Group -- New Idea -- modified (optional)
Line 166 -- INTA -- modified (to not be required if applicant has TM rights)
Line 167 -- RySG -- Agreement (qualified) -- some want to eliminate, some want to modify
Line 168 -- NCSG -- New Idea, Concerns -- modified (as in, insert contractual requirements), curative mechanism
Line 169 -- Registrar Stakeholder Group -- Divergence -- eliminated (as in, support or non-objection should never be needed)
Line 170 -- Group of Registries -- Divergence -- eliminated (as in, support or non-objection should never be needed)
Line 171 -- RDS-HN -- [comment]

Question e10:
Line 173 -- Government of Spain, etc. -- modified (as in, the letter should always be required), does not reference specific proposals
Line 174 -- Portuguese Government -- modified (as in, the letter should always be required), does not reference specific proposals
Line 175 -- Governments of Argentina, Chile, and Colombia -- modified (as in, the letter should always be required), does not reference specific proposals
Line 176 -- dotBerlin -- proposal 21
Line 177 -- dotzon -- proposals 19 (variant 3), 21, 23, 26, 24, and 25 (but qualified)
Line 178 -- Registrar Stakeholder Group -- proposal 20
Line 179 -- IPC -- Supports proposals 19, 20, 26; opposes proposal 19 v1, v2, and v3; 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
Line 180 -- United States -- modified (to a different standard…); curative mechanism/PIC; does not reference specific proposals
_______________________________________________
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20190417/75414d5f/attachment.html>