[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Notes & Action Items - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Work Track 5 - 08 May 2019

Justine Chew justine.chew at gmail.com
Thu May 9 07:04:47 UTC 2019


Hi Julie,

I am responding to the action item assigned to me in the notes below
regarding the ALAC's comment to Q19 Variant 1, Line 26 in the f.2.3.2
worksheet.  I had already posted my confirmation -- please refer to the chat
transcript for the call
<https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2019-05-08+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Procedures+PDP+Work+Track+5?preview=/105387527/109481220/Attendance%20%26%20chat%20WT5%2008%20May%202019%20.pdf>
at the last page time-checked 01:52:56, which I now extract and reproduce
as follows:-

*"01:52:56 Justine Chew: f.2.3.2 Line 26/3, I confirm ALAC's comment is
captured completely and yes, there was both support and opposition to
Proposal 19 Variant 1 but we only provided explanation to the opposition."*

Many thanks,

Justine Chew
ALAC liaison for Subsequent Procedures
-----


On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 00:55, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org> wrote:

> Dear Work Track 5 members,
>
>
>
> Please see below the action items and notes from the Work Track 5 meeting
> today, 08 May 2019.  *These high-level notes are designed to help WT5
> members navigate through the content of the call and are not a substitute
> for the recording, transcript, or the chat, which will be posted on the
> wiki at:
> https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2019-05-08+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Procedures+PDP+Work+Track+5
> <https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2019-05-08+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Procedures+PDP+Work+Track+5>.
> *
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Julie
>
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
>
>
> *Notes and Action Items:*
>
>
>
> *Actions:*
>
>
>
> Country and territory names (see deliberations section f.2.2.2 for context),
> Question 13:
>
> ACTION ITEM 1: Line 48 -- BRG -- change to “neither agrees nor disagrees”.
>
> ACTION ITEM 2: Line 49 -- CITC -- change to “Divergence”.
>
>
>
> Country and territory names (see deliberations section f.2.2.7 for context)
>
> *Question 15*:
>
> ACTION ITEM 3: Line 6 -- Government of Spain, etc. -- Change to
> “Concerns/New Idea”
>
> ACTION ITEM 4: Line 16 -- IPC -- Change to “Agreement (Qualified)”
>
>
>
> Names requiring government support/non- objections from the 2012 AGB (see
> deliberations section f.2.3.1 for context)
>
> ACTION ITEM 5: Staff will review the section and add explanatory notes as
> necessary to suggest if there is support for more or fewer restrictions.
>
> *Question 17*:
>
> ACTION ITEM 6: Line 8 -- IPC -- Change to “Agreement (Qualified)”
>
> ACTION ITEM 7: Line 10 -- Group of Registries -- change to “Agreement
> (Qualified)”
>
> ACTION ITEM 8: Line 13 -- BRG -- Change to “Agreement (Qualified)”
>
> *Question 18*:
>
> ACTION ITEM 9: Line 33 -- INTA -- Delete the explanatory note and move to
> the column for notes.
>
>
>
> Names requiring government support/non- objections from the 2012 AGB (see
> deliberations section f.2.3.2 for context)
>
> *Question 19*:
>
> ACTION ITEM Line 9 -- ALAC -- Change to “Agreement (qualified)”
>
>
>
> *Question 19, Variant 1 -- Supplemental Protections*: Line 26 -- ALAC --
> Agreement, Divergence
>
> ACTION ITEM 10: Justine will check the comment.
>
>
>
> *Notes:*
>
>
>
> 1. Updates to Statements of Interest (SOI): Nick Wenben-Smith had an update
>
>
>
> 2. Continue Review of Public Comments -- Options/Proposals:
>
>
>
> *Country and territory names (see deliberations section f.2.2.2 for
> context) – start at line 8*
>
>
>
> *Question 11*:
>
> Lines 8-15: Divergence, agreeing that strings should generally be made
> available.
>
> Lines 16-25: Divergence
>
>
>
> *Question 12*:
>
> Line 27 -- RrSG -- Agreement
>
> Lines 28-31: Agreement (qualified) and Divergence, strings should be made
> generally available
>
> Lines 32-35: Divergence, strings should be made generally available
>
> Lines 36-46: Divergence
>
>
>
> *Question 13*:
>
> Line 48 -- BRG -- [comment: this could be construed as support]
>
> -- change to neither agrees nor disagrees with the idea
>
> Line 49 -- CITC -- [comment: this could be construed as qualified support]
>
> -- change to “Divergence”
>
> Line 50 -- RySG -- Concerns, Divergence
>
> Lines 51-55 -- Divergence, strings should be made generally available
>
> Lines 56-66 -- Divergence
>
> -- Concerns about the use of the term “divergence” -- characterize as
> “non-support”?
>
> -- “Divergence” is the term we have been using.
>
> Line 67 -- Group of registries -- [comment: proposal is unclear]
>
>
>
> *Country and territory names (see deliberations section f.2.2.6 for
> context)*
>
>
>
> *Question 14*:
>
> Lines 6-10: Agreement
>
> Lines 11-25: Divergence
>
> Line 26: Government of Spain, etc. -- no position
>
>
>
> *Country and territory names (see deliberations section f.2.2.7 for
> context)*
>
>
>
> *Question 15*:
>
> Lines 6 -- Government of Spain, etc. -- Agreement
>
> -- Doesn’t agree that it should only be the country, so this should be
> changed to Concerns, New Idea
>
> Lines 7-17: Agreement
>
> -- IPC comment on line 16 -- seems that the IPC is not agreeing with any
> evidence that the country can provide; change to “Agreement (Qualified)”.
>
> Line 18 -- BRG -- Concerns
>
> Line 19 -- RySG -- Concerns (needs clarity)
>
> Lines 20-24: Divergence
>
> Line 25 -- Portuguese Government -- no position
>
>
>
> *Question 16*:
>
> Lines 27-36: Agreement
>
> Line 37 -- RySG -- Agreement, Divergence -- The status quo did not allow
> for translations in this category
>
> Line 38 -- United States -- New Idea, Concerns -- Seems to support adding
> translations, but only official languages of the UN and country
>
> Lines 39-46: Divergence
>
>
>
> *Names requiring government support/non- objections from the 2012 AGB (see
> deliberations section f.2.3.1 for context)*
>
>
>
> ACTION: Review the section and add explanatory notes where there is
> general agreement or divergence to suggest if there is support or not for
> more or fewer restrictions.
>
>
>
> *Question 17*:
>
> Lines 6-11: Agreement
>
> Line 8 -- IPC -- Agreement
>
> -- Change to “Agreement (Qualified)”
>
> Line 10 -- Group of Registries -- Agreement
>
> -- This proposal is not the first choice -- change to “Agreement
> (Qualified)”
>
> Line 12 -- United States -- Agreement (Qualified)
>
> Line 13 -- BRG -- Agreement (preference, though open to compromise of
> existing implementation)
>
> -- Change to “Agreement (Qualified)”
>
> Line 14 -- RySG -- Agreement (qualified) Divergence
>
> Lines 15-23: Divergence
>
>
>
> *Question 18*:
>
> Lines 25-32: Agreement
>
> Line 33 -- INTA -- Agreement (can be inferred, since they refer an
> intended-use provision as a balanced approach)
>
> -- Delete the explanatory note and move to the column for notes.
>
> Line 34 -- RySG -- Agreement (qualified) Divergence
>
> Lines 35-42: Divergence
>
>
>
> *Names requiring government support/non- objections from the 2012 AGB (see
> deliberations section f.2.3.2 for context)*
>
>
>
> *Question 19*:
>
> Lines 6-9: Agreement
>
> -- Change ALAC at line 9 to “Agreement (qualified)”
>
> Lines 10-11 -- Group of Registries and IPC -- Agreement (Qualified)
>
> Lines 12-13 -- United States and INTA -- Agreement (Qualified), New Idea
>
> Line 14 -- RySG -- Agreement (Qualified), Divergence
>
> Lines 15-22: Divergence -- includes changing BRG to divergence
>
>
>
> *Question 19, Variant 1 -- Supplemental Protections*:
>
> Line 24 -- INTA -- Agreement
>
> Line 25 -- United States -- Agreement (Qualified), Concerns
>
> Line 26 -- ALAC -- Agreement, Divergence
>
> -- ACTION: Justine will check the comment.
>
> Line 27 -- IPC -- Divergence (Qualified)
>
> Lines 28-38: Divergence
>
>
>
> Next Meeting: 15 May at 20:00 UTC -- Start at Question 19, Variant 2 --
> Change in scope of protections
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20190509/c7dcbc99/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list