[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Following up today's discussion on transferring names

[Kathy Kleiman]

Hi All,
I think it is more than information. We've touched on a gap - that 
requires disclosure as a condition of transfer - and a possibility of 
alternatives that would not require that disclosure. We've even touched 
on possibilities that might enable such a transfer - between registrars 
and between affiliated p/p service providers - to take place within the 
existing system and possibly using existing keys.  This is an important 
gap to fill from a Registrant perspective -- and a great discussion that 
should be continued!

Best,
Kathy




:
>
> I agree the discussion and presentation today were highly relevant to 
> relay.
>
> On B 3 itself, should we be specifying that one responsibility of 
> accredited providers is to fully disclose to customers how use of 
> their service may impact the customer's ability to transfer to another 
> registrar?   (Or, put another way, how efforts to transfer will affect 
> provision of the service.)
>
> If the relay obligation is sufficiently robust, then this disclosure 
> requirement might be less important, but it would be worthwhile to 
> mark this point here, pending the relay discussion.
>
> Steve Metalitz
>
> *From:*gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org 
> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Maria Farrell
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 15, 2014 11:35 AM
> *To:* gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Following up today's discussion on 
> transferring names
>
> Dear Don / Steve / James and Mary,
>
> Thanks so much for the presentation on today's call. I learnt a lot 
> about how the privacy & proxy services interact with the transfer 
> policies, which was hugely helpful.
>
> Can we make sure we tie this information / discussion into the 
> relevant work items? My suggestion is that we would come back to what 
> we learnt today when we come to talk about 'relay', and also towards 
> the end of our work in the wrap-up side of things to do a sanity check 
> on how any possible recommendations might impact on the transfer policy.
>
> Does that make sense? Or perhaps it fits into other areas I haven't 
> considered.
>
> Many thanks to James for the presentation.
>
> All the best, Maria
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140415/936528c3/attachment.html>