[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Some additional subtopics arising from the thousands of comments we received
Kathy Kleiman
kathy at kathykleiman.com
Mon Jul 20 23:25:08 UTC 2015
Hi All,
I have now reviewed a number of the comments, as I hope you have. As
discussed in an earlier email, I think there are other topics we should
be looking at in the sub-teams based on the outpouring of responses from
companies, organizations, and especially thousands of individuals. My
thought is not to create additional sub-teams, but to assign additional
topics to sub-teams (so the sub-teams remain diverse and well-staffed).
Here are three additional topics that arise from a review of the
comments - and I would be interested in hearing what others have found
as well.
A) Due process: thousands of commenters call for due process, and the
call is not necessarily or exclusively for court orders. Due process is
considered to be a fundamental balance and fairness and ability of all
parties involved to participate equally in a process impacting them.
What do the commenters say about due process and how might these
recommendations be incorporated into all or various aspects of the draft
recommendations and report?
B) Use of proxy/privacy registration and abuse of registrants who do not
have them. We have received /thousands /of pieces of data on abuses of
domain name data - some of which we knew and and some that we did not.
What are the types of problems that registrants -- legitimate, good
faith registrants -- have shared with us in these comments and how can
their experiences be better reflected in our work?
C) Speech/expression/anonymity/chilling effects. These are mentioned in
a number of the longer, substantive comments coming in from groups both
inside ICANN and outside. What are the issues being raised and how can
we better address them in our draft recommendations and report? /See
e.g, comment of //Center for Democracy and Technology, New America's
Open Technology Institute, and Public Knowledge./
To Steve's three topics and sub-teams below, I would add the following
important expansion to insure that we look into the full range of topics
an issue offers -- even if those who commented did not use the right
words or vocabulary - /additions in italics below. /
(1) Section 1.3.2 of the Initial Report (on escalation of relay requests
and the handling of disclosure/publication requests from third parties
other than IP rights holders);
(2) Section 1.3.3 (on the open question regarding online financial
transactions) /to include a review of those comments that addressed the
////commerical/noncommercial distinction more generally and evaluate if
these commenters provide insight and guidance on the "sub-commercial
use" issue of financial transactions as well/ /(with note that those
outside of ICANN may use non-ICANN terms and vocabulary to approach the
same concern)/; and
(3) Annex E (the Illustrative Disclosure Framework) -- /hopefully with
the subteam also evaluate the new subtopic A, Due Process, and the
issues commenters have raised in their thousands of "due process"
comments as they might impact the review and revisions of these detailed
framework recommendations*.
*
/Best,
Kathy*
*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150721/b048ca24/attachment.html>
More information about the Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
mailing list