[Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy] progress so far, next steps

[Farell Folly]

Hello All,

Thanks David for all your commitment towards the success of this subgroup.
I apologize for my tardiness on the summaries. Please find the document in
attach, regarding the following subjects :


   1. summary of the "WHOIS Proxy/Privacy Abuse" document
   2. summary of the "WHOIS Privacy and Proxy Relay & Reveal Survey"
   document


I would like to point out that the second document out in our database
(managed by Lisa) contains only 3 pages that describe the need for the
survey. I notice that the survey report itself  is not also part of the
documents to check (and I don't know why). However, I pointed out the
conclusion of the survey and a link to access the report, in my summary,
and I think it is sufficient for understanding the issue.
I still have one question for @Lisa, Have the full survey been conducted so
far ?


Le mar. 19 avr. 2016 à 18:01, David Cake <davecake at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Thanks for the volunteering and hard work - the checklist has almost every
> item assigned and many submitted. I recognise that that is a heap of work,
> and thank everyone who volunteered.
>
> During the 20 April RDS PDP WG call, each team will be asked to report on
> its progress and share preliminary thoughts about the questions posed
> during last week’s WG call. To kick-start this discussion, I ask that each
> of you try to answer this question:
>
>
>
> *Which “top 5” inputs summarized by this team are likely to be the most
> helpful to this PDP and why?*For example, does the input define potential
> requirements that this WG should take into consideration during phase 1 of
> this PDP? Does the input identify dependencies that will shape our work
> plan?
>
> Our team will have an opportunity to share initial answers during the WG
> call. Please reply to this list today with your own initial thoughts so
> that we can prepare to contribute to discussion during the WG call. We will
> not be expected to have a team-agreed answer this week, but we need to at
> least begin this discussion.
>
> The top 5 is just to get us started. We may not end up presenting our work
> in that format at all, but hopefully it will get us moving.
>
> For example I’d suggest that the Obligations of Data Controllers document
> would be a valuable one for all WG members to read.
>
> We also had a bit of a discussion on how to handle discussion of the
> ‘Privacy Shield’ issue - an issue that is very rapidly changing with knew
> documents appearing regularly. It demonstrates a problem with our work -
> some areas change so rapidly that we will need to keep updating the
> document list regularly, rather than hope to summarise relevant inputs
> during this document summary part of the process.
>
> David
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list
> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy

-- 
Best regards,

@__f_f__
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy/attachments/20160419/b3c5714c/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Summary_WHOIS Privacy-Proxy Abuse.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 17659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy/attachments/20160419/b3c5714c/Summary_WHOISPrivacy-ProxyAbuse-0001.docx>