[gnso-rds-pdp-purpose] Team outputs - Summaries

[Gomes, Chuck]

It would be very much appreciated if the three of you could in just a few minutes each do this.

Chuck

From: gnso-rds-pdp-purpose-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-purpose-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Susan Kawaguchi
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 12:51 AM
To: Gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-purpose] Team outputs - Summaries

Hello Team,

Thank you to Susan Prosser, Tjabbe Bos  and Maryan Rizinski for providing their input on the most important  documents and rationale.   Would you each be able to discuss on the call your rationale for choosing these documents?    I apologize for the late email but it would be helpful for the discussion on the call.

Best,
Susan Kawaguchi
Domain Name Manager
Facebook Legal Dept.


From: <gnso-rds-pdp-purpose-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-purpose-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Maryan Rizinski <rizinski at gmail.com<mailto:rizinski at gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 4:26 PM
To: "Gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org>" <Gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-purpose] Team outputs - Summaries

Dear Susan, all,

I would list the following inputs as most helpful:


  *   WHOIS Policy Review Team Final Report (2012)
  *   SAC055, WHOIS: Blind Men and an Elephant (September 2012)
  *   EWG Recommendations for a Next-Generation RDS
  *   GAC Communiqués regarding WHOIS (2007-2015)
  *   Article 29 WP on ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law (2007)

As Tjabbe mentioned, some of these documents are both useful and exhaustive and, in my opinion, represent a comprehensive basis for the upcoming discussions in our PDP.

Best regards,

Maryan


On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Susan Kawaguchi <susank at fb.com<mailto:susank at fb.com>> wrote:
During the 20 April RDS PDP WG call, each team will be asked to report on its progress and share preliminary thoughts about the questions posed during last week?s WG call. To kick-start this discussion, I ask that each of you try to answer this question:

Which top 5 inputs summarized by this team are likely to be the most helpful to this PDP and why?


For example, does the input define potential requirements that this WG should take into consideration during phase 1 of this PDP? Does the input identify dependencies that will shape our work plan?

The following are personal choices and I am using these as an example of what we need to discuss BUT each sub team member needs to provide their input.

WHOIS Policy Review Team Final Report<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_files_final-2Dreport-2D11may12-2Den.pdf&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=gvEx8xF7ynrYQ7wShqEr-w&m=Um9LPy5NeJc0bzCRJXJITjs11VDc-mPUdDoFstMAfSI&s=VkyWGJjGiXmWNxpwUxeBKAS7iluf0v5EEQQnRemjBvw&e=> (2012)

SAC055, WHOIS: Blind Men and an Elephant<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_files_sac-2D055-2Den.pdf&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=gvEx8xF7ynrYQ7wShqEr-w&m=Um9LPy5NeJc0bzCRJXJITjs11VDc-mPUdDoFstMAfSI&s=W7YSspCkpy5re5rGjKsDrQtEeL5QifCIccbYUXhVjvw&e=> (September 2012)


EWG Recommendations for a Next-Generation RDS<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_files_final-2Dreport-2D06jun14-2Den.pdf&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=gvEx8xF7ynrYQ7wShqEr-w&m=Um9LPy5NeJc0bzCRJXJITjs11VDc-mPUdDoFstMAfSI&s=hsKNTrSyaOx2rCNW8v0soyWoGWx02ai3ReWjkVNRh-E&e=>, especially

-        Section 3, Users and Purposes

-        Annex C, Example Use Cases
Annex A, Board Questions

    Registrar Accreditation Agreement<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_pages_approved-2Dwith-2Dspecs-2D2013-2D09-2D17-2Den&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=gvEx8xF7ynrYQ7wShqEr-w&m=Um9LPy5NeJc0bzCRJXJITjs11VDc-mPUdDoFstMAfSI&s=f3-kXKEPuHSQG2EX57lQ-kjvxJii8LP6aUmKAuoOxaI&e=> (2013)

Our team will have an opportunity to share initial answers during the WG call. Please reply to this list today with your own initial thoughts so that we can prepare to contribute to discussion during the WG call. We will not be expected to have a team-agreed answer this week, but we need to at least begin this discussion.Gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org> <Gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org>>

Looking forward to a lively discussion.
Susan Kawaguchi
Domain Name Manager
Facebook Legal Dept.


_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-purpose mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-purpose<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Drds-2Dpdp-2Dpurpose&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=gvEx8xF7ynrYQ7wShqEr-w&m=Um9LPy5NeJc0bzCRJXJITjs11VDc-mPUdDoFstMAfSI&s=qf6vit6I1rXAt1biXQdG39XEAgFqhsuCFM0m4tsPeRU&e=>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-purpose/attachments/20160420/05ed250a/attachment-0001.html>