[gnso-rds-pdp-purpose] Team outputs - Summaries

Wed Apr 20 11:49:54 UTC 2016

Hi Susan, Chuck, all,

Sorry for not being able to join the call this morning. The schedule was
too early for me to catch up with it as I was already commuting to work. At
any rate, I am providing some textual input on my rationale for choosing
the documents.

*EWG Recommendations for a Next-Generation RDS*

This comprehensive document has relevant sections that identify, analyze
and define in a rigorous way the various categories of users and their
purpose for accessing registration data. The analysis of the EWG is well
structured and also carefully summarized in tables that are both detailed
and, at the same time, precise and easy to read. In brief, the EWG
recommendations provide a solid base for framing the questions that we are
trying to address in our working group. The document is an excellent source
of information that would help us facilitate our subsequent deliberations.

*WHOIS Policy Review Team Final Report (2012)*

This report is another comprehensive document similar to the EWG
recommendations. It contains a number relevant parts that give hints to
answering the question of what is the over-arching purpose of collecting,
maintaining, and providing access to gTLD registration data. The importance
of this question makes the WHOIS report relevant to this PDP.

*SAC055, WHOIS: Blind Men and an Elephant (September 2012)*

SAC055 provides further insight into the WHOIS Policy Review Team Final
Report (2012). In particular, SAC055 emphasizes the need of a single
consensus policy, explains why the attempts to reach consensus failed
repeatedly and suggests recommendations to the ICANN Board of Directors to
help overcome the challenges that occurred in the past.

*GAC Communiqués regarding WHOIS (2007-2015)*

The GAC principles regarding gTLD WHOIS services identify a number of
important areas where WHOIS data is used such as supporting Internet's
security and stability, determining availability of domain names, enforcing
national and international laws, combating against abusive uses of ICTs,
etc. All these recommendations are solid and also related to this PDP so
they may help facilitate our work.

*Article 29 WP on ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy
Law (2007)*

This letter
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/schaar-to-cerf-12mar07-en.pdf>
stresses the importance of defining the purpose of registration data so
that its processing and use complies with EU data and protection
legislation. I think that ensuring such legal compliance should be always
kept in mind when defining the purpose in our PDP so that registrars
operating under EU legislation do not face legal issues when trying to meet
the registrar accreditation agreements.

Best regards,

Maryan

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:

> It would be very much appreciated if the three of you could in just a few
> minutes each do this.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* gnso-rds-pdp-purpose-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> gnso-rds-pdp-purpose-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Susan Kawaguchi
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 20, 2016 12:51 AM
> *To:* Gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-purpose] Team outputs - Summaries
>
>
>
> Hello Team,
>
>
>
> Thank you to Susan Prosser, Tjabbe Bos  and Maryan Rizinski for providing
> their input on the most important  documents and rationale.   Would you
> each be able to discuss on the call your rationale for choosing these
> documents?    I apologize for the late email but it would be helpful for
> the discussion on the call.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Susan Kawaguchi
>
> Domain Name Manager
>
> Facebook Legal Dept.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *<gnso-rds-pdp-purpose-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Maryan
> Rizinski <rizinski at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 4:26 PM
> *To: *"Gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org" <Gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-purpose] Team outputs - Summaries
>
>
>
> Dear Susan, all,
>
>
>
> I would list the following inputs as most helpful:
>
>
>
>    - WHOIS Policy Review Team Final Report (2012)
>    - SAC055, WHOIS: Blind Men and an Elephant (September 2012)
>    - EWG Recommendations for a Next-Generation RDS
>    - GAC Communiqués regarding WHOIS (2007-2015)
>    - Article 29 WP on ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with
>    Privacy Law (2007)
>
>
>
> As Tjabbe mentioned, some of these documents are both useful and
> exhaustive and, in my opinion, represent a comprehensive basis for the
> upcoming discussions in our PDP.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Maryan
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Susan Kawaguchi <susank at fb.com> wrote:
>
> During the 20 April RDS PDP WG call, each team will be asked to report on
> its progress and share preliminary thoughts about the questions posed
> during last week?s WG call. To kick-start this discussion, I ask that each
> of you try to answer this question:
>
> *Which top 5 inputs summarized by this team are likely to be the most
> helpful to this PDP and why?*
>
>
>
> For example, does the input define potential requirements that this WG
> should take into consideration during phase 1 of this PDP? Does the input
> identify dependencies that will shape our work plan?
>
>
>
> The following are personal choices and I am using these as an example of
> what we need to discuss BUT each sub team member needs to provide their
> input.
>
>
>
> *WHOIS Policy Review Team Final Report*
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_files_final-2Dreport-2D11may12-2Den.pdf&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=gvEx8xF7ynrYQ7wShqEr-w&m=Um9LPy5NeJc0bzCRJXJITjs11VDc-mPUdDoFstMAfSI&s=VkyWGJjGiXmWNxpwUxeBKAS7iluf0v5EEQQnRemjBvw&e=>*
> (2012)*
>
>
>
> *SAC055, WHOIS: Blind Men and an Elephant*
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_files_sac-2D055-2Den.pdf&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=gvEx8xF7ynrYQ7wShqEr-w&m=Um9LPy5NeJc0bzCRJXJITjs11VDc-mPUdDoFstMAfSI&s=W7YSspCkpy5re5rGjKsDrQtEeL5QifCIccbYUXhVjvw&e=>* (September
> 2012)*
>
>
>
> *EWG Recommendations for a Next-Generation RDS*
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_files_final-2Dreport-2D06jun14-2Den.pdf&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=gvEx8xF7ynrYQ7wShqEr-w&m=Um9LPy5NeJc0bzCRJXJITjs11VDc-mPUdDoFstMAfSI&s=hsKNTrSyaOx2rCNW8v0soyWoGWx02ai3ReWjkVNRh-E&e=>*,
> especially*
>
> -        *Section 3, Users and Purposes*
>
> -        *Annex C, Example Use Cases*
>
> *Annex A, Board Questions*
>
>
>
>     *Registrar Accreditation Agreement*
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_pages_approved-2Dwith-2Dspecs-2D2013-2D09-2D17-2Den&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=gvEx8xF7ynrYQ7wShqEr-w&m=Um9LPy5NeJc0bzCRJXJITjs11VDc-mPUdDoFstMAfSI&s=f3-kXKEPuHSQG2EX57lQ-kjvxJii8LP6aUmKAuoOxaI&e=>*
> (2013)*
>
> Our team will have an opportunity to share initial answers during the WG
> call. Please reply to this list today with your own initial thoughts so
> that we can prepare to contribute to discussion during the WG call. We will
> not be expected to have a team-agreed answer this week, but we need to at
> least begin this discussion.Gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org <
> Gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org>
>
>
>
> Looking forward to a lively discussion.
>
> Susan Kawaguchi
>
> Domain Name Manager
>
> Facebook Legal Dept.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-purpose mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-purpose
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Drds-2Dpdp-2Dpurpose&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=gvEx8xF7ynrYQ7wShqEr-w&m=Um9LPy5NeJc0bzCRJXJITjs11VDc-mPUdDoFstMAfSI&s=qf6vit6I1rXAt1biXQdG39XEAgFqhsuCFM0m4tsPeRU&e=>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-purpose mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-purpose
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-purpose/attachments/20160420/b5bd1e42/attachment-0001.html>