[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] @EXT: RE: Use cases: Fundamental, Incidental, and Theoretical

[Stephanie Perrin]

We don't know, because we have no statistics on the matter, but as was 
originally stated, at the moment there is no requirement to steal real 
identities and use their phone numbers and addresses if there is 
incomplete verification done.  Now, registrars (notably Elliot Noss) 
were stating last year that in response to the RAA requirements to cut 
off unverifiable phone numbers, they found no incidence of crime.  
However, the crime of ID theft is not going to start until the accuracy 
requirements cause problems...and it is not clear (without stats) that 
this is the case yet.  Just my 2cents Andrew, but it seems logical.

Stephanie


On 2016-08-08 9:02, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 10:52:04AM -0400, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>> corporations do, is that identity theft will surely follow greater accuracy
>> requirements.
> This is an interesting assertion, but I'm not sure how to evaluate its
> truth conditions.  Why is that sure?
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160808/6f561134/attachment.html>