[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] For WG Review - Redlined Problem Statement

[Sam Lanfranco]

Greg, As I understand it the "two camps" are just the providers of data 
and the users of data.

The wording might be "...or other groups, may have interests as 
providers of data or as users of data depending on circumstances."

Sam L.

On 8/18/2016 2:58 PM, Greg Aaron wrote:
>
> Attached is a revised draft, as requested.  Red-line and comments are 
> turned on.
>
> The first paragraph now quotes from the WG’s charter.  The last draft 
> paraphrased, which left out relevant sections of the WG’s mission. 
>  (Quoting from source docs can help us avoid omissions, scope creep, etc.)
>
> A question: the last draft said “Members of the global population of 
> end-users, whether they are individuals, organizations, companies, or 
> other groups, may fall into either camp depending on circumstances.”
>
> What are the two camps being referred to, and what are we trying to 
> say with this sentence?  It does not seem to be about anonymous 
> registrants in the preceding sentence, otherwise we’d say 
> “registrants” rather than “end-users.”  Are we trying to say that 
> there is a wide range of end-users and they may have various views on 
> the issues depending on their use cases and circumstances?
>
> All best,
>
> --Greg
>

-- 
------------------------------------------------
"It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
in an unjust state" -Confucius
  邦有道，贫且贱焉，耻也。邦无道，富且贵焉，耻也
------------------------------------------------
Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
email: Lanfran at Yorku.ca   Skype: slanfranco
blog:  http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160818/68850807/attachment.html>