[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] For WG Review - Redlined Problem Statement

[Ayden Férdeline]

Yes, this is a good addition, Rob. I support your suggested edit.


- Ayden


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] For WG Review - Redlined Problem Statement
Local Time: August 23, 2016 4:10 PM
UTC Time: August 23, 2016 3:10 PM
From: rob.golding at astutium.com
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org

> Consumers, the domain name industry, governments, intellectual property owners, and registrants all have a vested interest in an RDS system which contains accurate and complete registration data, and which is secure, resilient, accessible, auditable, and performs well.
> Additionally, some registrants desire anonymity and their requirements regarding data collection and data access may be at odds with others

I think we need to expand the "2nd set" (and remove registrants from the 1st set)
Something more like :
Additionally, Registrants have a right to privacy and a right (locale dependant) to control over access to their data, so their requirements may be at odds with others.


Rob


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160823/60a50464/attachment.html>