[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Final Problem Statement

[Sara Bockey]

Hi Marika,

It appears the community edits to the 2nd sentence in the first paragraph did not make it into the final statement.

The core problem will be to “deal with” the tension – were we not going to use “accommodate” or some other wording?  I personally think “take into consideration” or “ease” would be more appropriate as I still feel that this sentence goes beyond ICANN’s remit.

Thanks,

Sara

From: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
Date: Monday, August 29, 2016 at 9:36 AM
To: "gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Final Problem Statement

Dear All,

Following last week’s RDS PDP WG meeting, please find attached the final text of the problem statement. This final text will be posted here: https://community.icann.org/x/rACbAw. As a reminder, this problem statement is meant as a tool to aid in discussion, consistent with but not a constraint on the Working Group and its Charter.

Best regards,

Marika

Marika Konings
Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>

Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160830/cec2d616/attachment.html>