[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Is the U.S. handing over control of the internet? -- FCW

[Catalyst-Vaibhav Aggarwal]

This is Overboard. Pandora’s Box. With
It was just a Share for FYI - People have too much time at hand to write
mails ? To Asert is anything is relevant or not. In all fairness, if they
want to read - so don’t read - Why create a fuss over it ? And I am writing
this the 4th time ­ Hard to read ?
Use Case : I did not find your Pictures relevant so I stayed Quite. Well I
did not want to see or know about the trees that does not mean others didn’t
or want ?? How is it to me ????
So I am speaking for myself, You wasted my valuable time :-)

And it clearly implies, people don’t like Andrew BUT neither this is of my
concern nor anyone asked anyone’s opinion.

On 8/31/16, 8:21 PM, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:

> VA,
> 
> With all respect, I do not think that Michele's message was irrelevant at all.
> This is not the place to discuss the IANA transition.  And it is important
> that we stay focused on our task.  So I suggest that everyone heed his advice.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Catalyst-Vaibhav
> Aggarwal
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 10:01 AM
> To: Michele Neylon - Blacknight; Andrew Sullivan
> Cc: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Is the U.S. handing over control of the
> internet? -- FCW
> 
> Please don¹t write such Messages in this List - Its irrelevant !!!
> I, can¹t say for others, don¹t need you to tell us if other groups are
> existing or if IANA was important.
> 
> Thanks
> -Over & Out from Me
> 
> On 8/31/16, 7:20 PM, "Michele Neylon - Blacknight"
> <michele at blacknight.com> wrote:
> 
>> All
>> 
>> The IANA transition is a very important and interesting topic for
>> discussion.
>> 
>> However this PDP¹s mailing list is not the appropriate venue for those
>> discussions. There are plenty of other mailing lists and groups where
>> the discussion would be more pertinent.
>> 
>> If you have a burning desire to discuss it with some of this group¹s
>> members please do so offlist.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> Michele
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Mr Michele Neylon
>> Blacknight Solutions
>> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>> http://www.blacknight.host/
>> http://blacknight.blog/
>> http://www.blacknight.press - get our latest news & media coverage
>> http://www.technology.ie Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072 Direct Dial: +353
>> (0)59 9183090
>> Social: http://mneylon.social
>> Random Stuff: http://michele.irish
>> -------------------------------
>> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business
>> Park,Sleaty
>> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
>> 
>> 
>> On 30/08/2016, 19:52, "gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of
>> Group CEO-Vaibhav Aggarwal" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org on
>> behalf of va at bladebrains.com> wrote:
>> 
>>     It's just relevant - not important to be discussed. So if anyone
>> thinking it is to be discussed- super not kool :-)
>>     
>>     My share was just fyi - not discussion ! Some people chose to make
>> it a point to argue - well i chose to asert !
>>     
>>     Next time no Harry potter stories ;-)
>>     
>>     Sent from my mobile device. Typos regretted.
>>     
>>>     > On Aug 31, 2016, at 12:10 AM, Andrew Sullivan
>> <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>>>     > 
>>>     > Dear colleagues,
>>>     > 
>>>>     >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:33:50PM +0530, Group CEO-Vaibhav
>> Aggarwal wrote:
>>>>     >> Right so where is it irrelevant ? It is relevant - in this
>> group, in other groups or even in the professional roles we are in !!!
>>>     > 
>>>     > While I'm flattered that anyone should even notice anything I
>>>     > published anywhere, I think there are other venues around ICANN that
>>>     > are concentrating on the IANA transition, and I suggest that perhaps
>>>     > their mailing lists are a better place to discuss that topic.  This
>>>     > PDP will almost certainly proceed the same way regardless of what
>>>     > happens with the IANA stewardship transition, and it is helpful to
>>>     > keep the list discussion focussed on the topic at hand.
>>>     > 
>>>     > Best regards,
>>>     > 
>>>     > A
>>>     > -- 
>>>     > Andrew Sullivan
>>>     > ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>>>     > _______________________________________________
>>>     > gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>>>     > gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>>>     > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>>     
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>>     gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>>     
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160831/e4b5c556/attachment.html>