[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Is the U.S. handing over control of the internet? -- FCW
Catalyst-Vaibhav Aggarwal
va at bladebrains.com
Wed Aug 31 15:21:41 UTC 2016
This is Overboard. Pandora’s Box. With
It was just a Share for FYI - People have too much time at hand to write
mails ? To Asert is anything is relevant or not. In all fairness, if they
want to read - so don’t read - Why create a fuss over it ? And I am writing
this the 4th time Hard to read ?
Use Case : I did not find your Pictures relevant so I stayed Quite. Well I
did not want to see or know about the trees that does not mean others didn’t
or want ?? How is it to me ????
So I am speaking for myself, You wasted my valuable time :-)
And it clearly implies, people don’t like Andrew BUT neither this is of my
concern nor anyone asked anyone’s opinion.
On 8/31/16, 8:21 PM, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:
> VA,
>
> With all respect, I do not think that Michele's message was irrelevant at all.
> This is not the place to discuss the IANA transition. And it is important
> that we stay focused on our task. So I suggest that everyone heed his advice.
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Catalyst-Vaibhav
> Aggarwal
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 10:01 AM
> To: Michele Neylon - Blacknight; Andrew Sullivan
> Cc: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Is the U.S. handing over control of the
> internet? -- FCW
>
> Please don¹t write such Messages in this List - Its irrelevant !!!
> I, can¹t say for others, don¹t need you to tell us if other groups are
> existing or if IANA was important.
>
> Thanks
> -Over & Out from Me
>
> On 8/31/16, 7:20 PM, "Michele Neylon - Blacknight"
> <michele at blacknight.com> wrote:
>
>> All
>>
>> The IANA transition is a very important and interesting topic for
>> discussion.
>>
>> However this PDP¹s mailing list is not the appropriate venue for those
>> discussions. There are plenty of other mailing lists and groups where
>> the discussion would be more pertinent.
>>
>> If you have a burning desire to discuss it with some of this group¹s
>> members please do so offlist.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Michele
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mr Michele Neylon
>> Blacknight Solutions
>> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>> http://www.blacknight.host/
>> http://blacknight.blog/
>> http://www.blacknight.press - get our latest news & media coverage
>> http://www.technology.ie Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353
>> (0)59 9183090
>> Social: http://mneylon.social
>> Random Stuff: http://michele.irish
>> -------------------------------
>> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business
>> Park,Sleaty
>> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
>>
>>
>> On 30/08/2016, 19:52, "gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of
>> Group CEO-Vaibhav Aggarwal" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org on
>> behalf of va at bladebrains.com> wrote:
>>
>> It's just relevant - not important to be discussed. So if anyone
>> thinking it is to be discussed- super not kool :-)
>>
>> My share was just fyi - not discussion ! Some people chose to make
>> it a point to argue - well i chose to asert !
>>
>> Next time no Harry potter stories ;-)
>>
>> Sent from my mobile device. Typos regretted.
>>
>>> > On Aug 31, 2016, at 12:10 AM, Andrew Sullivan
>> <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Dear colleagues,
>>> >
>>>> >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:33:50PM +0530, Group CEO-Vaibhav
>> Aggarwal wrote:
>>>> >> Right so where is it irrelevant ? It is relevant - in this
>> group, in other groups or even in the professional roles we are in !!!
>>> >
>>> > While I'm flattered that anyone should even notice anything I
>>> > published anywhere, I think there are other venues around ICANN that
>>> > are concentrating on the IANA transition, and I suggest that perhaps
>>> > their mailing lists are a better place to discuss that topic. This
>>> > PDP will almost certainly proceed the same way regardless of what
>>> > happens with the IANA stewardship transition, and it is helpful to
>>> > keep the list discussion focussed on the topic at hand.
>>> >
>>> > Best regards,
>>> >
>>> > A
>>> > --
>>> > Andrew Sullivan
>>> > ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>>> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160831/e4b5c556/attachment.html>
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list