[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Is the U.S. handing over control of the internet? -- FCW
Greg Shatan
gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Wed Aug 31 15:37:00 UTC 2016
Vaibhav,
You are misreading the situation quite spectacularly. I will correct only
one aspect, since (you are right) I don't have time for more.
For the record, I have a great deal of professional and respect and even
affection for Andrew and find him to be among the most knowledgeable and
relevant participants in our work. (That doesn't mean I agree with
everything he says or writes....) I would expect that to be roundly
seconded (but hope for the sake of traffic it won't be and will be
understood as such; perhaps disagreements only, would be a good approach to
minimize email traffic).
I suggest that if you are not interested in other people's opinions on a
particular matter, you shouldn't post to the list. You may also wish to
consider how important listening and valuing other people's opinions is in
a bottom-up, consensus-driven, deliberative process such as this, if you
wish your contributions to be meaningful to and valued by others in the
long run (as I presume you do). Please take this in the constructive
spirit in which it is being offered.
Best regards,
Greg
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Catalyst-Vaibhav Aggarwal <
va at bladebrains.com> wrote:
> This is Overboard. Pandora’s Box. With
> It was just a Share for FYI - People have too much time at hand to write
> mails ? To Asert is anything is relevant or not. *In all fairness, if
> they want to read - so don’t read - Why create a fuss* over it ? *And I
> am writing this the 4th time – Hard to read ?*
> *Use Case : I did not find your Pictures relevant so I stayed Quite. Well
> I did not want to see or know about the trees that does not mean others
> didn’t or want ?? How is it to me ????*
> So I am speaking for myself, You wasted my valuable time :-)
>
> And it clearly implies, people don’t like Andrew BUT neither this is of my
> concern nor anyone asked anyone’s opinion.
>
> On 8/31/16, 8:21 PM, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:
>
> VA,
>
> With all respect, I do not think that Michele's message was irrelevant at
> all. This is not the place to discuss the IANA transition. And it is
> important that we stay focused on our task. So I suggest that everyone
> heed his advice.
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-
> bounces at icann.org <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf Of
> Catalyst-Vaibhav Aggarwal
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 10:01 AM
> To: Michele Neylon - Blacknight; Andrew Sullivan
> Cc: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Is the U.S. handing over control of the
> internet? -- FCW
>
> Please don¹t write such Messages in this List - Its irrelevant !!!
> I, can¹t say for others, don¹t need you to tell us if other groups are
> existing or if IANA was important.
>
> Thanks
> -Over & Out from Me
>
> On 8/31/16, 7:20 PM, "Michele Neylon - Blacknight"
> <michele at blacknight.com> wrote:
>
> All
>
> The IANA transition is a very important and interesting topic for
> discussion.
>
> However this PDP¹s mailing list is not the appropriate venue for those
> discussions. There are plenty of other mailing lists and groups where
> the discussion would be more pertinent.
>
> If you have a burning desire to discuss it with some of this group¹s
> members please do so offlist.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Michele
>
>
> --
> Mr Michele Neylon
> Blacknight Solutions
> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
> http://www.blacknight.host/
> http://blacknight.blog/
> http://www.blacknight.press - get our latest news & media coverage
> http://www.technology.ie Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353
> (0)59 9183090
> Social: http://mneylon.social
> Random Stuff: http://michele.irish
> -------------------------------
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business
> Park,Sleaty
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
>
>
> On 30/08/2016, 19:52, "gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of
> Group CEO-Vaibhav Aggarwal" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org on
> behalf of va at bladebrains.com> wrote:
>
> It's just relevant - not important to be discussed. So if anyone
> thinking it is to be discussed- super not kool :-)
>
> My share was just fyi - not discussion ! Some people chose to make
> it a point to argue - well i chose to asert !
>
> Next time no Harry potter stories ;-)
>
> Sent from my mobile device. Typos regretted.
>
> > On Aug 31, 2016, at 12:10 AM, Andrew Sullivan
> <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear colleagues,
> >
> >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:33:50PM +0530, Group CEO-Vaibhav
> Aggarwal wrote:
> >> Right so where is it irrelevant ? It is relevant - in this
> group, in other groups or even in the professional roles we are in !!!
> >
> > While I'm flattered that anyone should even notice anything I
> > published anywhere, I think there are other venues around ICANN that
> > are concentrating on the IANA transition, and I suggest that perhaps
> > their mailing lists are a better place to discuss that topic. This
> > PDP will almost certainly proceed the same way regardless of what
> > happens with the IANA stewardship transition, and it is helpful to
> > keep the list discussion focussed on the topic at hand.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > A
> > --
> > Andrew Sullivan
> > ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160831/eaae6cce/attachment.html>
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list