[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Is the U.S. handing over control of the internet? -- FCW
Catalyst-Vaibhav Aggarwal
va at bladebrains.com
Wed Aug 31 16:06:15 UTC 2016
1. I am not reading
2. Thanks for the Suggestion Greg Un wanted.
3. Now I think this is a List where Only so much is discussed for the time
being.
Lastly TO CLOSE THIS THREAD - Offense is Unintentional. love always
From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 at 9:07 PM
To: Vaibhav Aggarwal <va at bladebrains.com>
Cc: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com>, Michele Neylon - Blacknight
<michele at blacknight.com>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>,
"gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Is the U.S. handing over control of the
internet? -- FCW
Vaibhav,
You are misreading the situation quite spectacularly. I will correct only
one aspect, since (you are right) I don't have time for more.
For the record, I have a great deal of professional and respect and even
affection for Andrew and find him to be among the most knowledgeable and
relevant participants in our work. (That doesn't mean I agree with
everything he says or writes....) I would expect that to be roundly
seconded (but hope for the sake of traffic it won't be and will be
understood as such; perhaps disagreements only, would be a good approach to
minimize email traffic).
I suggest that if you are not interested in other people's opinions on a
particular matter, you shouldn't post to the list. You may also wish to
consider how important listening and valuing other people's opinions is in a
bottom-up, consensus-driven, deliberative process such as this, if you wish
your contributions to be meaningful to and valued by others in the long run
(as I presume you do). Please take this in the constructive spirit in which
it is being offered.
Best regards,
Greg
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Catalyst-Vaibhav Aggarwal
<va at bladebrains.com> wrote:
> This is Overboard. Pandora’s Box. With
> It was just a Share for FYI - People have too much time at hand to write mails
> ? To Asert is anything is relevant or not. In all fairness, if they want to
> read - so don’t read - Why create a fuss over it ? And I am writing this the
> 4th time Hard to read ?
> Use Case : I did not find your Pictures relevant so I stayed Quite. Well I did
> not want to see or know about the trees that does not mean others didn’t or
> want ?? How is it to me ????
> So I am speaking for myself, You wasted my valuable time :-)
>
> And it clearly implies, people don’t like Andrew BUT neither this is of my
> concern nor anyone asked anyone’s opinion.
>
> On 8/31/16, 8:21 PM, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:
>
>> VA,
>>
>> With all respect, I do not think that Michele's message was irrelevant at
>> all. This is not the place to discuss the IANA transition. And it is
>> important that we stay focused on our task. So I suggest that everyone heed
>> his advice.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
>> [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Catalyst-Vaibhav
>> Aggarwal
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 10:01 AM
>> To: Michele Neylon - Blacknight; Andrew Sullivan
>> Cc: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Is the U.S. handing over control of the
>> internet? -- FCW
>>
>> Please don¹t write such Messages in this List - Its irrelevant !!!
>> I, can¹t say for others, don¹t need you to tell us if other groups are
>> existing or if IANA was important.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Over & Out from Me
>>
>> On 8/31/16, 7:20 PM, "Michele Neylon - Blacknight"
>> <michele at blacknight.com> wrote:
>>
>>> All
>>>
>>> The IANA transition is a very important and interesting topic for
>>> discussion.
>>>
>>> However this PDP¹s mailing list is not the appropriate venue for those
>>> discussions. There are plenty of other mailing lists and groups where
>>> the discussion would be more pertinent.
>>>
>>> If you have a burning desire to discuss it with some of this group¹s
>>> members please do so offlist.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Michele
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mr Michele Neylon
>>> Blacknight Solutions
>>> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>>> http://www.blacknight.host/
>>> http://blacknight.blog/
>>> http://www.blacknight.press - get our latest news & media coverage
>>> http://www.technology.ie Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
>>> <tel:%2B353%20%280%29%2059%C2%A0%C2%A09183072> Direct Dial: +353
>>> (0)59 9183090
>>> Social: http://mneylon.social
>>> Random Stuff: http://michele.irish
>>> -------------------------------
>>> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business
>>> Park,Sleaty
>>> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30/08/2016, 19:52, "gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of
>>> Group CEO-Vaibhav Aggarwal" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org on
>>> behalf of va at bladebrains.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> It's just relevant - not important to be discussed. So if anyone
>>> thinking it is to be discussed- super not kool :-)
>>>
>>> My share was just fyi - not discussion ! Some people chose to make
>>> it a point to argue - well i chose to asert !
>>>
>>> Next time no Harry potter stories ;-)
>>>
>>> Sent from my mobile device. Typos regretted.
>>>
>>>> > On Aug 31, 2016, at 12:10 AM, Andrew Sullivan
>>> <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Dear colleagues,
>>>> >
>>>>> >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:33:50PM +0530, Group CEO-Vaibhav
>>> Aggarwal wrote:
>>>>> >> Right so where is it irrelevant ? It is relevant - in this
>>> group, in other groups or even in the professional roles we are in !!!
>>>> >
>>>> > While I'm flattered that anyone should even notice anything I
>>>> > published anywhere, I think there are other venues around ICANN that
>>>> > are concentrating on the IANA transition, and I suggest that perhaps
>>>> > their mailing lists are a better place to discuss that topic. This
>>>> > PDP will almost certainly proceed the same way regardless of what
>>>> > happens with the IANA stewardship transition, and it is helpful to
>>>> > keep the list discussion focussed on the topic at hand.
>>>> >
>>>> > Best regards,
>>>> >
>>>> > A
>>>> > --
>>>> > Andrew Sullivan
>>>> > ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>>>> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>>>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160831/8338b0d0/attachment.html>
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list