[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Notes and action items from Next-Generation RDS PDP WG Meeting

[Jennifer Gore Standiford]

I would think the FCC would have some issues with additional phone numbers being presented within the WHOIS without active acceptance by the Registrants. 

-----Original Message-----
From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Stephanie Perrin
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 7:34 PM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Notes and action items from Next-Generation RDS PDP WG Meeting

The short answer is, in most categories, they want the data.  I would suggest that random internet users by and large dont want their cell phone numbers out there on WHOIS....
But I may be exhibiting my privacy bias....Stephanie

On 2016-02-24 19:14, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 06:36:40PM -0500, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>> While I think we should try to resist the tendency to split hairs
> Yes.
>
>> Remember our goals are simply to find out a little bit more about the 
>> individuals who have volunteered, and compare that skillset with our 
>> desired expertise list.
> It's this I'm really trying to understand.  For each category, I've 
> been trying to understand how that category has an interest that isn't 
> "random Internet user".  (Hence some of my questions in response to
> Greg.)
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>

_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg