[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] possible requirements from GAC / law enforcement recommended documents

Kiran Malancharuvil Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com
Thu Jul 14 16:49:01 UTC 2016


Correct Terri. Ridiculous attempt to smear and discredit.

Contactable information does not require home details, and no one has ever claimed otherwise.

Kiran Malancharuvil
Policy Counselor
MarkMonitor
415-419-9138 (m)

Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos.

On Jul 14, 2016, at 9:39 AM, Terri Stumme <terri.stumme at legitscript.com<mailto:terri.stumme at legitscript.com>> wrote:


Law enforcement never requested "personal details, home address etc of senior STAFF of a Registrar listed on a website." Law enforcement requested only that the names of the executives be posted on the registrar's website, and that contact information for the registrar; i.e., company address and telephone number, not the home address of senior staff.

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Rob Golding <rob.golding at astutium.com<mailto:rob.golding at astutium.com>> wrote:
On 2016-07-14 08:58, Catalyst-Vaibhav Aggarwal wrote:
So now v agree to say that GAC / Law enforcement is over reaching
and suggestions, pants made are baseless and have no argument.

You appear to turn many ideas / comments you don't understand into some sort of personal attack.

Perhaps if you had
* read the document
* understood the document
* attended any of the multiple Registrar&LEA meetings where some of their wants (most of which they never expected to get and many of which they couldn't provide any reason for asking for)
you wouldn't be jumping so quickly to these weird conclusions.

YET we come back to the table and talk of Privacy and other related
factors. How can it be ?

One (of many) examples ..

LEAs wanted the personal details, home address etc of senior STAFF of a Registrar listed on a website.

Not simply provided (as is law in most locales) to the company regulating authority in that region - most of whom DO NOT make that information public without a warrant for very valid reasons

Not even just submitted to ICANN (as indeed much information about the management of a registrar already is) for them to know / leak

But published for anyone and everyone on the registration website

If someone LEA or otherwise wants to to talk to my Registrar, they can do so at the office (by appointment) or by phone or by email or through the ticket system or any number of other *appropriate* and *documented* methods - they DO NOT need to know about and turn up at my HOME address

Rob
--
Rob Golding   rob.golding at astutium.com<mailto:rob.golding at astutium.com>
Astutium Ltd, Number One Poultry, London. EC2R 8JR

* domains * hosting * vps * servers * cloud * backups *

_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg



--
Terri Stumme
Investigative Analyst
<RAA Negotiations_Transcript- Update on the RAA Negotiations (EN) (1).pdf>
<LEA Recommendations (1).pdf>
_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg



More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list