[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] An important technical consideration about nature of the service (was Re: The overflowing list )

Andrew Sullivan ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Sat Jul 16 05:00:25 UTC 2016


Thanks, Stephanie, for the quick issue list.  There's one thing that I
want to draw out here so that we can keep it foremost when thinking of
issues:

On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 12:05:10AM -0400, Stephanie Perrin wrote:

>  * Where the RDS (whether a central database or federated or completely
>    disaggregated) resides becomes important for law enforcement access.

This "where data resides" issue is bound to vex us, no matter what
kind of policy we come up with.  But it's really important to keep in
mind that the different styles of system design will yield very
different properties.

In the taxonomy I offered before
(http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/2016-June/000951.html),
models I and V have a clear since answer to, "Where does the data
reside?" because they have a single database backing them up.  In
models II-IV, however, the answer to, "Where does the data reside?" is
actually not entirely meaningful.  There are multiple places where the
data are, and for data with respect to any given domain name each
datum might be in a different place.  (Indeed, part of the design of
RDAP is precisely to make such arrangements easier to deal with.)

It is therefore better to try to find a way, consistent with all of
the various requirements documents, to answer some other questions.
I think these might be helpful in building use cases:

    1.  For any given datum, who has control of and access to the datum?

    2.  For any given datum, what are the conditions under which the
    datum ought to be accessible?

    3.  For any given set of related data, how can it be accessed?

Notice that answering (3) will provides use cases for data access,
whereas (1) and (2) provide for limit conditions on how and when use
cases might be apply.

I hope these framing questions are helpful in figuring out which use
cases we can bring to bear on requirements.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com



More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list