[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] possible alternative "groups"

[Ayden Férdeline]

Stephanie,
Thank you so much for your efforts in producing this document. I strongly
support your proposed framework for categorising the possible requirements.
To your comment on page 10, I think there would be value in an index being
produced that sorted the requirements by keyword as well.
Best wishes,
Ayden Férdeline





On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 3:50 AM, Stephanie Perrin stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca wrote:
As discussed in the call last week (July 20th), I had some alternative thoughts
on the categories chosen to sort our triage spreadsheet, while very much
appreciating the amount of work Lisa and Susan have already done on it. Chuck
asked me if I could come up with an alternative, as he did not want to slow down
to tinker with the categories, which everyone might select differently.
Accordingly, I have come up with what I hope is a framework of categories that
relies more on the type of potential requirement (eg. function, technical,
legal, etc) rather than keywords. I have put almost all of the other groups into
what I think are the logical slots in my proposed framework, and included a
column for keywords if people really want to search by word phrases.

I hope this may be useful. We are likely to be working with this document for a
long time, so I think the sorting framework which we ultimately use may be more
important than it appears at first glance. It is really a coding mechanism for
qualitative analysis, so it could introduce bias into our results if we are not
careful. My rough attempt obviously reflects my own analysis of how to sort the
data, and as Chuck mentioned, each person would pick keywords differently, but I
hope you agree after reading it that the matter deserves a bit more reflection.
I would be happy to answer any questions.


Stephanie Perrin



Ayden Férdeline Statement of Interest
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160725/882ddd92/attachment.html>