[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] possible alternative "groups"

[Klaus Stoll]

Dear Stephanie

Greetings and Thanks for your hard work. At this occasion may I thank 
all in this group, staff or participants, who have put in so much effort 
so far.

After reading Stephanies document and thinking it over, I think this is 
a valuable approach which I like to support. One of the important points 
is that even the "non-experts", will have to be able to work with it and 
understand what is going on. There might be some refinements possible 
that even more streamline the approach and categories.

I urge my fellow group members to have a good look at what Stephanie has 
produced and if possible support its adoption and maybe suggest some 
further refinements.

Yours

Klaus


On 7/24/2016 10:50 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>
> As discussed in the call last week (July 20th), I had some alternative 
> thoughts on the categories chosen to sort our triage spreadsheet, 
> while very much appreciating the amount of work Lisa and Susan have 
> already done on it.  Chuck asked me if I could come up with an 
> alternative, as he did not want to slow down to tinker with the 
> categories, which everyone might select differently.  Accordingly, I 
> have come up with what I hope is a framework of categories that relies 
> more on the type of potential requirement (eg. function, technical, 
> legal, etc) rather than keywords.  I have put almost all of the other 
> groups into what I think are the logical slots in my proposed 
> framework, and included a column for keywords if people really want to 
> search by word phrases.
>
> I hope this may be useful. We are likely to be working with this 
> document for a long time, so I think the sorting framework which we 
> ultimately use may be more important than it appears at first glance.  
> It is really a coding mechanism for qualitative analysis, so it could 
> introduce bias into our results if we are not careful.  My rough 
> attempt obviously reflects my own analysis of how to sort the data, 
> and as Chuck mentioned, each person would pick keywords differently, 
> but I hope you agree after reading it that the matter deserves a bit 
> more reflection.  I would be happy to answer any questions.
>
> Stephanie Perrin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160725/57b3de57/attachment.html>