[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] possible alternative "groups"

[Stephanie Perrin]

Gosh I thought I had only left out one....sorry, will check back and 
reply in time for tomorrow.  Perhaps one of my versions did not save 
properly. Will fix prior to the meeting...

cheers Stephanie


On 2016-07-25 19:02, Susan Kawaguchi wrote:
> Hi Stephanie,
>
> Thanks for taking a deeper look at the keyword groups I chose when 
> reviewing all the possible requirements.  I think the analysis you are 
> working on is the natural next step in looking at the possible 
> requirements.
> The keyword exercise was simply to make it easier to group similar PR 
> and make sure we didn’t leave anything out and that appears to be 
> where you are going.  I do wonder why you left out keyword groups  A, 
> T, Y, Ab and Aw?
>
> Thanks again for taking the next step.
> Susan Kawaguchi
> Domain Name Manager
> Facebook Legal Dept.
>
>
> From: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org 
> <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Stephanie 
> Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca 
> <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>>
> Date: Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 7:50 PM
> To: "gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>" 
> <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>>, 
> "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com <mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>>
> Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] possible alternative "groups"
>
> As discussed in the call last week (July 20th), I had some alternative 
> thoughts on the categories chosen to sort our triage spreadsheet, 
> while very much appreciating the amount of work Lisa and Susan have 
> already done on it.  Chuck asked me if I could come up with an 
> alternative, as he did not want to slow down to tinker with the 
> categories, which everyone might select differently.  Accordingly, I 
> have come up with what I hope is a framework of categories that relies 
> more on the type of potential requirement (eg. function, technical, 
> legal, etc) rather than keywords.  I have put almost all of the other 
> groups into what I think are the logical slots in my proposed 
> framework, and included a column for keywords if people really want to 
> search by word phrases.
>
> I hope this may be useful. We are likely to be working with this 
> document for a long time, so I think the sorting framework which we 
> ultimately use may be more important than it appears at first glance.  
> It is really a coding mechanism for qualitative analysis, so it could 
> introduce bias into our results if we are not careful.  My rough 
> attempt obviously reflects my own analysis of how to sort the data, 
> and as Chuck mentioned, each person would pick keywords differently, 
> but I hope you agree after reading it that the matter deserves a bit 
> more reflection.  I would be happy to answer any questions.
>
> Stephanie Perrin
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160725/3bf8d52f/attachment.html>