[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Outreach #2 / Draft 3
cgomes at verisign.com
Sat Jun 18 14:13:26 UTC 2016
Thanks for doing this Lisa.
Let me add that I think our original instructions for Outreach #2 suggested that groups review the possible requirements list: "Over the past several weeks the WG has been working on Work Plan Task 8 to develop a first cut of a 'Possible Requirements List for gTLD Registration Data and Directory Services'. A copy of that list as of the date of this request is posted on the WG wiki<https://community.icann.org/x/shOOAw> in pdf<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56986791/RDS%20PDP%20List%20of%20Possible%20Requirements%20D3%20-%2010%20June.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1465652929146&api=v2> and word<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56986791/RDS%20PDP%20List%20of%20Possible%20Requirements%20D3%20-%2010%20June.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1465652899541&api=v2>. Please review this initial list according to the guidelines below and submit any additional possible requirements that you think should be added."
We have since realized as a lot of you have that the very large size of the list of possible requirements made it unrealistic for those not in the WG to review it in responding to Outreach #2 in the short time allowed. They are of course welcome to do that if they have time, but we are now saying that that is not necessary and that groups may suggest possible requirements without doing the list review first. As Lisa says, if liaisons can readily eliminate duplicates proposed by their respective groups, that would be nice but that also is not a requirement. We will eliminate duplicates after we receive the responses to Outreach #2.
Hopefully, this will make it much easier for each group to respond to the request prior to or in the Helsinki WG sessions.
From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lisa Phifer
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 3:07 PM
To: RDS PDP WG
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Outreach #2 / Draft 3
To answer questions raised by Steve and others on outreach #2, Chuck has asked me to share this clarification - especially for those of you who volunteered to liaise with your SO/AC/SG/Cs during this informal outreach.
We are not expecting SO/AC/SG/Cs to review/comment on the initial list of possible requirements. The initial list was attached to outreach message #2 as examples of possible requirements taken from input sources and related to charter questions. However, this initial list is just a starting point, prior to any WG deliberation.
To make sure this starting point is inclusive and comprehensive, outreach message #2 informally invited other groups to suggest additions if they wish. It is okay for groups to opt out of providing additions at this early stage or to simply suggest possible requirements without reviewing the initial list. If WG members serving as liaisons are able to flag any existing list items that are similar to items suggested by their group, that is appreciated but not required.
The WG will continue to expand, organize, and refine this on-going list to reflect additional inputs and WG progress, but there is simply not enough time to prepare, review and distribute another draft in advance of Helsinki. As such, the draft 3 attached to outreach message #2 must suffice as our starting point for cross-community discussion at ICANN56.
At 10:07 AM 6/11/2016, Marika Konings wrote:
Outreach message #2 has been posted here: https://community.icann.org/x/pYxlAw. Those that have volunteered to serve as a lead point of contact for their respective groups (see https://community.icann.org/x/Nh_OAw) should have received a separate email with instructions. Thank you for your assistance.
Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>
Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>.
From: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Lisa Phifer <lisa at corecom.com<mailto:lisa at corecom.com>>
Date: Saturday 11 June 2016 at 08:23
To: "gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Draft 3 of Initial Possible Requirements List
Draft 3 of the initial possible requirements list is attached and has been posted on your wiki in DOC and PDF formats, both under Phase 1 documents and on the Sign-Up Sheet.
Thanks to all of you who worked over these past several weeks to extract possible requirements from key input documents!
You should find every assignment that was completed before 10 June incorporated into Draft 3. Note that key input documents and possible requirements were assigned unique numbers as they were reformatted and incorporated into Draft 3; new possible requirements were simply added to the end of the appropriate section(s) without any attempt to group similar items from different sources. In some cases, where the same exact possible requirement was mapped to multiple questions, this was simply noted to reduce repetition and simplify review.
There are still some assignments underway. A brief list of those key input documents have been included at the end of Draft 3 simply to let reviewers know those documents are being worked. You can still find the Sign-Up Sheet itself and links to all original submissions here: https://community.icann.org/x/shOOAw
Watch for another email to this WG list regarding Outreach Message #2 and further instructions for those of you who volunteered to assist with informal SO/AC/SG/C outreach.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg