[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Draft early outreach message for WG review

[Farell Folly]

Hello all,

No comment but Holly's suggestion.
Le 8 mai 2016 03:56, "Lisa Phifer" <lisa at corecom.com> a écrit :

> Hi Holly,
>
> This might be a good example of how the WG can use the mind map to see how
> the data elements charter question (below) does or does not cover all of
> those concerns.
>
> The full WG will begin using this mind map during next Tuesday's call to
> consider how to work through the first five charter questions. Subquestions
> in the mind map were drawn from the charter and Issue Report, but
> subquestions will no doubt be refined and added as the WG attempts to
> answer these charter questions.
>
> Best, Lisa
>
> [image: Emacs!]
>
> Source:
> RDS-PDP-Phase1-FundamentalQs-SubQs-MindMap-2May 2016.pdf
> <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/58739599/RDS-PDP-Phase1-FundamentalQs-SubQs-MindMap-2May%202016.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1462234568000&api=v2>
>
>
> At 02:22 PM 5/7/2016, Holly Raiche wrote:
>
> Thanks Lisa
>
> What the data group has  been exploring is just what data is actually
> collected by registries/registrars.
>
> I realise that the original Charter questions were framed around gTLD
> registration data - the ‘Whois’ data that must be made public under the
> 2013 RAA.  But what the data group has identified is that there is more
> data in question than just the ‘Whois’ data. Yet these questions are framed
> around the gTLD data.
>
> Somewhere, there should be a question - or something - that suggests that
> the Charter questions should go further to at least consider what data is
> collected and why, and whether it should be the subject of data protections.
>
> Thanks
>
> Holly
>
>
> On 8 May 2016, at 2:57 am, Lisa Phifer <lisa at corecom.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > A reminder that PDP WG feedback if any on the attached early outreach
> message is due no later than tomorrow - Sunday 8 May 23.59 UTC.
> >
> > Best, Lisa
> >
> > At 12:07 PM 5/3/2016, Lisa Phifer wrote:
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> As agreed during today's WG call, attached please find a slightly
> revised draft input template to solicit early input from ICANN SOs/ACs and
> GNSO SG/Cs. This is the template discussed in today's WG call.
> >>
> >> Remember, there will be many opportunities for community input
> throughout this PDP. The attached input template is to be used to initiate
> the early outreach required of every PDP to inform the WG at the start of
> its work. The template is a tool used successfully by other PDP WG's to
> solicit structured input, along with any additional input each group wishes
> to provide.
> >>
> >> WG member feedback on this draft input template is welcome: please send
> any feedback to the entire WG list <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> no later
> than Sunday 8 May 23.59 UTC.
> >>
> >> Our goal is to send the final version of this template to initiate
> early outreach next week.
> >>
> >> Best, Lisa
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> >> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
> > <RDS PDP - SO AC SG C Input Template - 2 May 2016
> rev.pdf>_______________________________________________
> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160508/69307301/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1f56d29e.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 103695 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160508/69307301/1f56d29e.jpg>