[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] List of Possible requirements from Green Paper: Improvement of Technical Management of Internet Names and Addresses (1998)

[Farell Folly]

Okay Chuck.

@Lisa, referring to my previous e-mail and in order to continue processing
with the pending documents, I will take this one as my second :

White Paper: Management of Internet Names and Addresses, Statement of
Policy (2012)

Le 31 mai 2016 15:12, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com> a écrit :

> Farell,
>
>
>
> You are correct that the ‘new private not-for-profit organization’ is
> ICANN.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Farell Folly
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:13 AM
> *To:* RDS PDP WG
> *Subject:* [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] List of Possible requirements from Green
> Paper: Improvement of Technical Management of Internet Names and Addresses
> (1998)
>
>
>
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> In attach three files containing three categories (registries, registrars,
> Trademarks and dispute resolution) of requirements. I must add that the
> document was created in 1998 when US government intended to transfer the
> mangement of the database from IANA to a new private not-for-profit
> organization (I think this is now ICANN, right?) and may be most of the
> requirements have been taken into account somewhere between 1998 and 2012,
> before the EWG report. I just want to bring your attention on that.
>
>
>
> @Lisa, I Haven't named all the requirements yet. What I've just done is,
> for instance, to write *[DE-xx-yy] , [DP-xx-yy]  for requirements which
> address Data Elements and Data Privacy. I will update xx as soon as the
> document cited in the mail object is added to Annex A.*
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
>
>
> @__f_f__
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160531/56dbe6fc/attachment.html>