[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] List of Possible requirements from Green Paper: Improvement of Technical Management of Internet Names and Addresses (1998)
cgomes at verisign.com
Tue May 31 13:12:05 UTC 2016
You are correct that the ‘new private not-for-profit organization’ is ICANN.
From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Farell Folly
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:13 AM
To: RDS PDP WG
Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] List of Possible requirements from Green Paper: Improvement of Technical Management of Internet Names and Addresses (1998)
In attach three files containing three categories (registries, registrars, Trademarks and dispute resolution) of requirements. I must add that the document was created in 1998 when US government intended to transfer the mangement of the database from IANA to a new private not-for-profit organization (I think this is now ICANN, right?) and may be most of the requirements have been taken into account somewhere between 1998 and 2012, before the EWG report. I just want to bring your attention on that.
@Lisa, I Haven't named all the requirements yet. What I've just done is, for instance, to write [DE-xx-yy] , [DP-xx-yy] for requirements which address Data Elements and Data Privacy. I will update xx as soon as the document cited in the mail object is added to Annex A.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg