[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] FW: Notes from today's RDS PDP WG meeting
Greg Aaron
gca at icginc.com
Thu Sep 22 16:39:46 UTC 2016
Rob: the professionals in that area disagree. Reference for example: http://docs.apwg.org/reports/apwg-ipc_Advisory_WhoisDataForPhishingSiteTakeDown200803.pdf
It's a document in the WG reference list.
Like I said earlier, it's not the proper time to debate the merits of the various "possible requirements."
All best,
--Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Rob Golding
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 9:54 AM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] FW: Notes from today's RDS PDP WG meeting
> Safeguard 3: Should Registry Operators undertake periodic security
> checks to analyze whether domains in its gTLD are being used for
> threats to security, such as pharming, phishing, malware and botnets?
None of which requires "registration" data ...
pharming = content
phishing = content
malware = content
botnets = traffic [and are primarily ip based not domain based] etc
Rob
_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list