[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed Definition/Background for Authoritative
Sam Lanfranco
sam at lanfranco.net
Wed Apr 5 17:41:21 UTC 2017
I agree with the position that the core question is: WHAT/WHICH fields
need to be authoritative?
The WHO, /and especially the HOW for verification/, are other
discussions, mostly involving a discussion between ICANN, Registries,
and Registrars.
Sam L.
On 4/5/2017 1:30 PM, John Bambenek via gnso-rds-pdp-wg wrote:
>
> Isn't the question of WHAT is authoritative the question here? WHO is
> authoritative is another discussion.
>
> My view is that authoritative means what is either what is entered by
> the domain owner (or given via proxy for whois privacy, which should
> be free to all entities) or an identical copy of it kept in sync with
> any changes made by the owner as they are made. In so far as
> "accurate" data is required, it should be after verification of the
> data by the consumer for whatever fields have to go through verification.
>
< rest deleted>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170405/8f142afd/attachment.html>
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list