[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed Definition/Background for Authoritative

[Sam Lanfranco]

I agree with the position that the core question is:  WHAT/WHICH fields 
need to be authoritative?

The WHO, /and especially the HOW for verification/, are other 
discussions, mostly involving a discussion between ICANN, Registries, 
and Registrars.

Sam L.


On 4/5/2017 1:30 PM, John Bambenek via gnso-rds-pdp-wg wrote:
>
> Isn't the question of WHAT is authoritative the question here? WHO is 
> authoritative is another discussion.
>
> My view is that authoritative means what is either what is entered by 
> the domain owner (or given via proxy for whois privacy, which should 
> be free to all entities) or an identical copy of it kept in sync with 
> any changes made by the owner as they are made.  In so far as 
> "accurate" data is required, it should be after verification of the 
> data by the consumer for whatever fields have to go through verification.
>
  < rest deleted>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170405/8f142afd/attachment.html>