[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed Agenda for RDS PDP WG Meeting Tuesday 25 April 16.00 UTC

[Gomes, Chuck]

Thanks Theo.  Do I understand you are saying that you could support thin Whois data elements as public data in the RDS?



Regardless, I would still like to see if we can find a resolution to Marc's concern as long as we don't spend an inordinate amount of time on it.  I will try to reach out to Marc to see if I can understand his position better.  And the Leadership team will try to schedule a call later this week to work on this further.



Chuck



From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of theo geurts
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 2:31 PM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed Agenda for RDS PDP WG Meeting Tuesday 25 April 16.00 UTC



Repeating my agreement with the below as mentioned earlier on the call.

Regarding my earlier comments about NO WHOIS, still technically feasible, and in my opinion good to think outside of the box and check what the purpose is, and I think we should keep checking the purpose all the time. For the progress of the WG, it is best to move to gated access and use thin WHOIS for now as available public data.

For the discussion about gated access perhaps it is an idea look at the IPC/RrSG developed framework for the PPSAI to see if that is sufficient to address copyright and trademark concerns. Could save us work if that is workable.

Best,

Theo Geurts




On 25-4-2017 16:40, Victoria Sheckler wrote:

   Apologies for missing last week's and today's meeting.  With respect to item 4 below, based on the discussion we've had to date, I believe all thin whois data should be publicly available as it is either not personally identifiable information, or, in extreme edge cases (such as a long domain name that includes personal information), then it is clear that that individual has chosen to make such information public.



   From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lisa Phifer
   Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 12:51 PM
   To: RDS PDP WG <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org><mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
   Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed Agenda for RDS PDP WG Meeting Tuesday 25 April 16.00 UTC



   Dear all,

   The next GNSO Next-Gen RDS PDP Working Group teleconference will take place on Tuesday, 25 April at  16.00 UTC

   Below please find the proposed agenda for this meeting, along with links to meeting materials, which can all be found on the meeting page:  https://community.icann.org/x/DcPRAw

   Regards,
   Lisa

   Proposed Agenda for RDS PDP WG Meeting 25 April 16.00 UTC
   1) Roll Call/SOI Updates
   2) Plan to complete in-progress tasks
       a) ccTLD questions
       b) Definition of authoritative
   3) Revised Task 12 sequence and timeline
       See RDSPDP-Task12-Revised-21April2017.pdf<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56986784/RDSPDP-Task12-Revised-21April2017.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1492802630734&api=v2>
   4) Start deliberation on the charter question/subquestion 5.1:
       Should gTLD registration "thin data" be entirely public or should access be controlled?
       See NewSection5-Intro-KeyConcepts-21April2017.pdf<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078605/NewSection5-Intro-KeyConcepts-21April2017.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1492802791000&api=v2>
   5) Confirm action items and proposed decision points
   6) Confirm next meeting date: 2 May 2017 at 16:00 UTC

   Meeting Materials: https://community.icann.org/x/DcPRAw






   _______________________________________________
   gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
   gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
   https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170425/d1229546/attachment.html>