[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Contractibility, PBC and required contact methods....

[John Bambenek]

Devils advocate, there are often reasons to try to get immediate contact with a domain owner... phone is still the primary method of that. 

--
John Bambenek

> On Aug 24, 2017, at 12:30, Jeremy Malcolm <jmalcolm at eff.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 24/8/17 9:15 am, Greg Aaron wrote:
>> Two WG calls ago, we had extensive discussion about how legal processes require multiple methods of contactability.  And require physical addresses, not just electronic service.
> 
> I missed that call, but it's not quite accurate since a court can order substituted service by email.  Even publishing a notice in the newspaper can be used for service if the court allows it.
> 
> In any case, I agree with Volker that there should not be three mandatory contact methods.  Physical and/or email address should be enough.
> 
> -- 
> Jeremy Malcolm
> Senior Global Policy Analyst
> Electronic Frontier Foundation
> https://eff.org
> jmalcolm at eff.org
> 
> Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161
> 
> :: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::
> 
> Public key: https://www.eff.org/files/2016/11/27/key_jmalcolm.txt
> PGP fingerprint: 75D2 4C0D 35EA EA2F 8CA8 8F79 4911 EC4A EDDF 1122
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170824/b36f5bc5/attachment.html>