[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] New Year Challenge

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Wed Jan 4 19:50:03 UTC 2017


Andrew,

I agree 100% with the key point.

Greg

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:44:50PM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote:
> > set forth in Section 3.12 of the RAA, it's confusing at best to call all
> of
> > these intermediaries "resellers."
>
> Sure.  We can call them Sparky the Wonder Dogs, if we like; but the
> key point is that it is useful -- for network operations, for
> technical support people, and for lawyers who realise that their
> clients' domain names are registered improperly -- to be able to look
> up this minimal information about who registered a domain name, and to
> do so without formal credentials (because _ex hypothesi_ here the
> "real" domain name holder doesn't have a direct relationship with the
> registrar or, in some of these cases, isn't actually the registrant).
>
> The question started off as whether there was a legit use case for
> this, and I think we've demonstrated through this discussion that
> there is.
>
> A
>
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170104/c0281cde/attachment.html>


More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list