[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] RDS Review (formerly AoC WHOIS Review)

[Carlton Samuels]

Thanks Alan.  Bears some discussion, especially in light of the several
dependencies the GNSO Council has forked.

-Carlton


==============================
*Carlton A Samuels*

*Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment &
Turnaround*
=============================

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
wrote:

> I don't think that this message has yet been forwarded to this group. If
> it was and I missed it, I apologize for the duplication.
>
> In summary, It had been suggested that the upcoming RDS Review be limited
> to a review of whether the last WHOIS Review Recommendations had been
> implemented. The intent was to limit the ongoing work on RDS issues and
> relive the stress of those actively participating.
>
> The GNSO has now indicated that although they want to avoid duplication,
> they would want a far more extensive review.
>
> I beleive that we need to discuss this.
>
> Alan
>
>
> From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com>
>> Subject: Re: RDS Review
>> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 17:42:53 +0000
>>
>>
>> Dear Karen and Community Leaders –
>> >
>> The GNSO Council, working with its component Stakeholder Groups and
>> Constituencies, has produced this document (attached), which outlines our
>> feedback and concerns with the proposed “limited scope† for the
>> upcoming RDS review.  The document was submitted to ICANN Staff, and
>> sharing with this team for your reference.
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> J.
>> ----------------
>> James Bladel
>> GNSO Chair
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170110/cc239931/attachment.html>