[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPORTANT: Reminder - Poll from 28 June Meeting

[Kathy Kleiman]

+1 to Sara's comment.

Question: I thought the question on the table in Johannesburg was what 
data needed to be collected in order to provide the service of domain 
name registration and maintenance?  How does that lead to a referendum 
on the data elements of the EWG report?

By way of background, the EWG report changed considerably from its 
"draft" to its "final" form - adding dozens of pages to the final report 
never reviewed or even seen by the ICANN Community. These included many 
funky new registration data elements, some which were optional, some 
which were not, some which were clearly defined, and many which were 
not. Questions raised about many of these registration data elements at 
the ICANN Meeting in London with the EWG were never answered.  To this 
day, I still don't understand the definition of many of these data elements.

A referendum on these fields now seems like a very odd place to be right 
now.

Best, Kathy

On 7/14/2017 2:12 PM, Sara Bockey wrote:
>
> I believe these polling questions are premature.  Given GDPR and 
> outstanding legal reviews, I don’t see how I can answer these 
> questions outside of a “wish list” response.
>
> Sara
>
> *From: *<gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Lisa Phifer 
> <lisa at corecom.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, July 12, 2017 at 10:08 AM
> *To: *"gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPORTANT: Reminder - Poll from 28 June 
> Meeting
>
> Dear all,
>
> Many thanks to the 14 WG members who have already completed this 
> week's poll and provided thoughtful rationale for and against data 
> elements beyond the minimum public data set (MPDS).
>
> For those who have not yet done so, please be sure to leave yourself 
> extra time to review the handout before taking this week's 
> longer-than-usual poll.
>
> Link to the poll:
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/P5MBXZ2
>
> Link to the handout, for info about each data elements beyond the MPDS:
> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086729/28JunePoll-DataElements-ExpandedHandout.pdf 
>
>
> Link to the last meeting's recording and transcript where this 
> approach was discussed:
> https://community.icann.org/x/lATfAw
>
> *This poll will close at COB this Saturday 15 July.
>
> *Best, Lisa
>
>
> At 04:05 PM 7/8/2017, Lisa Phifer wrote:
>
>     Dear all,
>
>     In follow-up to our ICANN59 F2F WG meeting, *all RDS PDP WG
>     Members* are encouraged to participate in the following poll:
>
>     *https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/P5MBXZ2
>
>     *Also attached is an *extended version of the Data Elements
>     handout* used for deliberation in our F2F meeting. This handout
>     provides information about each data element in this poll,
>     extracted from the EWG Final Report. /Please use time previously
>     set aside for our cancelled 11 July meeting to review this handout
>     and then complete this week?s longer-than-usual poll.
>     /
>     Responses should be submitted through the above URL. For offline
>     reference, a PDF of poll questions can also be found at:
>
>     https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64947348/Poll-from-28JuneCall.pdf
>
>
>     *This poll will close at COB Saturday 15 July.  Poll results and
>     the attached handout will be discussed in our 18 July 16.00 UTC WG
>     meeting.
>     *
>     Please note that you must be a WG Member to participate in polls.
>     If you are a WG Observer wishing to participate in polls, you must
>     first contact gnso-secs at icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org> to
>     upgrade to WG Member.
>
>     Regards,
>     Lisa
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170714/01fc2154/attachment-0001.html>