[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] poll Question 4, concept vi

[Lisa Phifer]

Greg,

Note that postal address and phone number are on our list of data 
elements to discuss in future WG calls, but have not yet been discussed.

Can you please frame your statements below in the form of an 
alternative statement that can be tested in this week's poll? For 
example, it appears that you may be suggesting alternatives to key 
concept v) such as:

- The registrant's postal address must be mandatory to collect and 
included in the RDS.
- The registrant's postal address must be optional to collect and 
included in the RDS.

However, I am not clear whether you intend those to be instead of or 
in addition to email address, which is the subject of the poll 
question v). Please clarify?

Thanks
Lisa


At 11:57 AM 7/25/2017, Greg Aaron wrote:
>You have to ask:
>1)  whether postal address should be required or optional, and
>2) whether phone number should be required or optional, and
>3) whether some other contact method (other than email, postal, and 
>phone) should be required or optional.
>
>Postal address and phone are required by current ICANN policies and 
>contracts, so we need to talk about them.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Lisa Phifer [mailto:lisa at corecom.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 1:43 PM
>To: Greg Aaron <gca at icginc.com>; gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] poll Question 4, concept vi
>
>Support for proposed key concept iv) is to be tested in this week's 
>poll. Feel free to suggest an alternative to be tested by 18.00 UTC.
>
>
>At 11:39 AM 7/25/2017, Greg Aaron wrote:
> >Dear Chuck and Lisa:
> >
> >I think item vi needs further discussion.  I don't think it follows
> >from the poll results, and I want to make sure everyone understand what
> >it implies.
> >
> >Today's handout (slide 4) said:
> >"Question 4: Registrant email Address...
> >Based on poll results (including comments), possible key concepts might be:
> >iv) Data enabling at least one way to contact the registrant must be
> >collected and included in the RDS.
> >v) At minimum, the registrant's email address must be collected and
> >included in the RDS.
> >vi) Data enabling one alternative or preferred method of contact may
> >also be optionally collected and included in the RDS."
> >
> >Item iv logically means: "postal address and phone number can be
> >optional to collect".  Those are alternate methods of contact.  But
> >only email address would be required.
> >
> >I don't think that conclusion follows from the polling, and I don't
> >think we've gotten that far.
> >
> >Personally, I think that postal address and phone are important to collect.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >--Greg
> >
> >**********************************
> >Greg Aaron
> >Vice-President, Product Management
> >iThreat Cyber Group / Cybertoolbelt.com
> >mobile: +1.215.858.2257
> >**********************************
> >The information contained in this message is privileged and
> >confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this
> >message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
> >responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you
> >are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
> >this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> >communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the
> >message and deleting it from your computer.
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> >gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> >https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg