[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPORTANT: Invitation for Poll from 25 July Meeting

[Chuck Gomes Consulting]

Let me say emphatically that the fact that we are focusing on email now in
no ways limits the inclusion of postal or phone contacts.  We will still
consider those.

 

Chuck

 

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Greg Aaron
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 6:14 PM
To: lisa at corecom.com; gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPORTANT: Invitation for Poll from 25 July
Meeting

 

I'm really surprised that this new poll doesn't present an option that
reflects current ICANN policy.   Current ICANN policy requires three means
(email, postal, phone).  The options that Lisa presented in the last poll
and then in the new one today limit to one or two required means. 

 

6. Proposed WG Agreement #30  

In the 25 July call, both support and opposition were expressed for the
following key concept, derived from last week's poll results:

In addition to email address, data enabling one alternative method of
contact must be collected and included in the RDS.

The following alternative phrasing has also been proposed:

Data enabling one or more alternative or preferred methods of contact may
also be optionally collected and included in the RDS.

Please indicate below whether you agree with either or neither phrasing of
this key concept. To suggest an alternative phrasing for this key concept,
use the comment box to do so and explain why.

a) Agree: In addition to email address, data enabling one alternative method
of contact must be collected and included in the RDS.

b) Agree: Data enabling one or more alternative or preferred methods of
contact may also be optionally collected and included in the RDS.

c) Disagree with this key concept, regardless of phrasing

d) Unsure, No Opinion, or Propose Alternative given in comment box below

 

 

When I filled out the poll today I proposed the following alternative:

"In addition to email address, data enabling AT LEAST ONE alternative method
of contact must be collected and included in the RDS."

 

Like I said, I'm surprised that this new poll doesn't present an option that
reflects current ICANN policy.   If you don't present that as one of the
choices, it won't get support because it's not in front of people.  

 

All best,

--Greg

 

 

 

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>
[mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lisa Phifer
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:19 PM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> 
Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPORTANT: Invitation for Poll from 25 July
Meeting
Importance: High

 

Dear all,

 

In follow-up to this week's WG meeting, all RDS PDP WG Members are
encouraged to participate in the following poll:

 

 <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ZF3VFJV>
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ZF3VFJV

 

Responses should be submitted through the above URL. For offline reference,
a PDF of poll questions can also be found at:

 

https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086734/Poll-from-25JulyCa
ll.pdf

 

This poll will close at COB Saturday 29 July.  Poll results will be
discussed in our 1 August WG meeting.

 

Please note that you must be a WG Member to participate in polls. If you are
a WG Observer wishing to participate in polls, you must first contact
gnso-secs at icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>  to upgrade to WG Member.

 

Regards,

Lisa

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170726/f681e05b/attachment.html>