[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Principle on Proportionality for "Thin Data"access

[John Bambenek]

I oppose inclusion of this concept.  It would be better to include that
discussion in defining what thin data is or in a debate on specific
fields.  That's where this debate belongs, namely, in haggling what
fields are private, what fields are thin data, and what fields exist
behind gated access should such system be decided on.


On 05/30/2017 02:07 PM, nathalie coupet via gnso-rds-pdp-wg wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> In the context of thin data, in view of the opposition of some to
> allow unauthenticated access to all the thin data, the principle of
> proportionality serves as an over-arching principle at this particular
> phase in our work in order to protect data from abuse while not
> restricting access.   
> Thin data must be proportionate to the query, be useful for that
> particular query. All and any other thin data foreign to this query
> should not be shared. This principle potentially avoids having to
> resort to 'legitimate purposes' which cannot be verified for
> unauthenticated access.   
>  
>  
> Nathalie 
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 2:44 PM, "Gomes, Chuck via gnso-rds-pdp-wg"
> <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> wrote:
>
>
> Because Nathalie was the originator and was unable to speak on the
> call, I encourage her to describe the nature of the issue on this thread.
>  
> Chuck
>  
> *From:*gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Paul Keating
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 30, 2017 2:17 PM
> *To:* Lisa Phifer <lisa at corecom.com>; RDS PDP WG
> <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Principle on
> Proportionality for "Thin Data"access
>  
> Im sorry to have missed the call but had a client engagement.
>  
> Can someone briefly describe the nature of the issue?
>  
> Thanks
> Paul
>  
> *From: *<gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Lisa Phifer
> <lisa at corecom.com <mailto:lisa at corecom.com>>
> *Date: *Tuesday, May 30, 2017 at 7:52 PM
> *To: *RDS PDP WG <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
> *Subject: *[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Principle on Proportionality for "Thin
> Data"access
>  
>
>     All, per today's call action item:
>
>     *Action Item: Nathalie Coupet and any other WG members who wish to
>     do so to propose to the WG list a new principle on proportionality
>     for "thin data." All WG members to comment on that proposed
>     principle in advance of next call.
>
>     *we are starting a new thread here which anyone may reply to if
>     they wish to propose (or respond to) a new principle on
>     proportionality for "thin data" access.
>
>     Best, Lisa
>     _______________________________________________ gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>     mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>     <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170530/72c7aa15/attachment-0001.html>