[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPORTANT: Invitation for Poll from 29 August Meeting

[John Bambenek]

I think the point is optional to collect, mandatory to display if present. 

So there are two sets of requirements.

1- what information domain registrants give
2- what information RDS displays

--
John Bambenek

> On Sep 2, 2017, at 10:11, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 04:50:41PM -0700, jonathan matkowsky wrote:
>> It may be important to note from the April 27 advisory
>> <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/registry-agreement-raa-rdds-2015-04-27-en>
>> on that Consensus Policy that if data exists for a given optional field,
>> the data MUST be shown. So I would suggest we define optional in that way.
> 
> That is a pretty unnatural definition of "optional", and certainly not
> one that I expect will be understood by any implementer.  Such a
> redefinition away from the plain English meaning of the word is just
> asking for bugs.  "Optional" means "you don't have to fill it in", not
> "someone might not have collected this".
> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg