[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPORTANT: Invitation for Poll from 29 August Meeting

[benny at nordreg.se]

Well for your 2. Phrase we are still talking collection, not displaying 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 2 Sep 2017, at 18:10, John Bambenek via gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> I think the point is optional to collect, mandatory to display if present. 
> 
> So there are two sets of requirements.
> 
> 1- what information domain registrants give
> 2- what information RDS displays
> 
> --
> John Bambenek
> 
>> On Sep 2, 2017, at 10:11, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>>> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 04:50:41PM -0700, jonathan matkowsky wrote:
>>> It may be important to note from the April 27 advisory
>>> <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/registry-agreement-raa-rdds-2015-04-27-en>
>>> on that Consensus Policy that if data exists for a given optional field,
>>> the data MUST be shown. So I would suggest we define optional in that way.
>> 
>> That is a pretty unnatural definition of "optional", and certainly not
>> one that I expect will be understood by any implementer.  Such a
>> redefinition away from the plain English meaning of the word is just
>> asking for bugs.  "Optional" means "you don't have to fill it in", not
>> "someone might not have collected this".
>> 
>> A
>> 
>> -- 
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg